More stories

  • in

    Brave becomes first browser to add native support for the IPFS protocol

    Image via Brave
    With the release of Brave 1.19 today, Brave has become the first major browser maker to support IPFS, a peer-to-peer protocol meant for accessing decentralized or censored content.

    Released in 2015, IPFS stands for InterPlanetary File System. It is a classic peer-to-peer protocol similar to BitTorrent and designed to work as a decentralized storage system.
    Also: Best VPNs • Best security keys
    IPFS allows users to host content distributed across hundreds or thousands of systems, which can be public IPFS gateways or private IPFS nodes. Users who want to access any of this content must enter an URL in the form of ipfs://{content_hash_ID}.
    Under normal circumstances, users would download this content from the nearest nodes or gateways rather than a central server. However, this only works if users have installed an IPFS desktop app or a browser extension.
    Brave says that with version 1.19, users will be able to access URLs that start with ipfs://, directly from the browser, with no extension needed, and that Brave will natively support ipfs:// links going forward.
    Since some major websites like Wikipedia have IPFS versions, users in oppressive countries can now use Brave’s new IPFS support to go around national firewalls and access content that might be blocked inside their country for political reasons and is available via IPFS.

    In addition, Brave also says that its users can also install their own IPFS node with one click with version 1.19 and help contribute to hosting some of the content they download to view.
    A focus on privacy features
    “We’re thrilled to be the first browser to offer a native IPFS integration with today’s Brave desktop browser release,” said Brian Bondy, CTO and co-founder of Brave. “Integrating the IPFS open-source network is a key milestone in making the Web more transparent, decentralized, and resilient.”
    This marks the second decentralized browsing protocol that Brave now supports after integrating the Tor network and the Onion protocol in June 2018 in the form of a feature now known as “Tor Tabs.”
    But Brave also said that work on its IPFS integration is also expected to expand in the coming future. The browser maker plans to support automatic redirects from DNSLink websites to their native IPFS versions, the ability to co-host an IPFS website, the ability to easily publish to IPFS, and more, in future versions.
    Native IPFS support is just the latest in a long line of privacy-focused features that Brave has added to its product. Previous ones include support for a private video chat system, a built-in ad blocker, fingerprinting randomization, minimal telemetry, query parameter filtering, social media blocking, and others.
    Brave, which launched in 2016 to great fanfare, is currently believed to have around 24 million monthly active users, after passing the 20 million mark last November. More

  • in

    Fake collaboration apps are stealing data as staff struggle with home working security

    There’s been a significant rise in organisations encountering malware attacks on remote devices over the course of the last year as employees have been forced to work from home.
    The ongoing coronavirus pandemic has resulted in more remote working than ever before and both organisations and employees have had to quickly adapt to this new environment and the additional challenges that come with it.
    One of those challenges is cyber criminals attempting to take advantage of remote workers’ insecure PCs as an entry point into corporate networks.
    As a result of this, there’s been a rise in malware attacks targeting remote workers and according to cybersecurity company Wandera’s Cloud Security Report 2021, over half of organisations – 52 percent – experienced a malware incident on a remote device. That’s up from just 37 percent of organisations experiencing malware attacks on remote devices during 2019.
    In many instances, cyber criminals are taking advantage of known vulnerabilities in software to help deliver malware under the radar, as users struggle with software management and patch installation without the direct aid of a corporate IT team.
    SEE: A winning strategy for cybersecurity (ZDNet special report) | Download the report as a PDF (TechRepublic)
    Remote workers are tricked into downloading malicious applications from phishing emails which install malware, but they believe they’re installing something which will help their productivity.

    “More often than not, the offending apps were being downloaded and installed by the remote workers themselves,” Michael Covington, VP at Wandera told ZDNet.
    “We saw a fairly large number of apps claiming to offer collaboration functionality, though in reality they were designed to steal private information like messaging content or trick the user into granting access to the camera and microphone, thus enabling a remote attacker to eavesdrop”.
    Worryingly, of those devices compromised by malware, over a third of users continued to access corporate emails while one in ten continued to access cloud services – both potentially providing hackers with much wider access to the network than they’d initially gained by compromised one remote machine.
    Securing remote employees is proving to be a challenge for information security teams, who themselves are are now also working remotely, making the job even more difficult.
    However, engaging with remote employees to provide advice on how to work safely and securely can go a long way to keeping them – and the wider organisation – safe from cyber attacks, something which will be better for everyone in the long run.
    “Continuously engaging with workers on the sign-in mechanisms they should use, the incident reporting they should follow, and the applications that are approved for work will help everyone do their part to protect the business and its assets,” said Covington.
    MORE ON CYBERSECURITY More

  • in

    FireEye releases tool for auditing networks for techniques used by SolarWinds hackers

    Image: Getty Images/iStockphoto
    Cybersecurity firm FireEye has released today a report detailing the techniques used by the SolarWinds hackers inside the networks of companies they breached.

    Together with the report, FireEye researchers have also released a free tool on GitHub named Azure AD Investigator that they say can help companies determine if the SolarWinds hackers (also known as UNC2452) used any of these techniques inside their networks.
    Also: Best VPNs • Best security keys
    Today’s FireEye report comes as the security firm has spearheaded investigations into the SolarWinds supply chain compromise, together with Microsoft and CrowdStrike.
    The SolarWinds hack came to light on December 13, 2020, when FireEye and Microsoft confirmed that a threat actor broke into the network of IT software provider SolarWinds and poisoned updates for the Orion app with malware.
    The malware, known as Sunburst (or Solorigate), was used to gather info on infected companies. Most of the 18,000 SolarWinds customers who installed a trojanized version of the Orion app were ignored, but for some selected targets, the hackers deployed a second strain of malware known as Teardrop and then used several techniques to escalate access inside the local network and to the company’s cloud resources, with a special focus on breaching Microsoft 365 infrastructure.
    In its 35-page report today, FireEye has detailed in great detail and depth these post initial compromise techniques, along with detection, remediation, and hardening strategies that companies can apply.

    Summarized, they are as follows:
    Steal the Active Directory Federation Services (AD FS) token-signing certificate and use it to forge tokens for arbitrary users (sometimes described as Golden SAML). This would allow the attacker to authenticate into a federated resource provider (such as Microsoft 365) as any user, without the need for that user’s password or their corresponding multi-factor authentication (MFA) mechanism.
    Modify or add trusted domains in Azure AD to add a new federated Identity Provider (IdP) that the attacker controls. This would allow the attacker to forge tokens for arbitrary users and has been described as an Azure AD backdoor.
    Compromise the credentials of on-premises user accounts that are synchronized to Microsoft 365 that have high privileged directory roles, such as Global Administrator or Application Administrator.
    Highjack an existing Microsoft 365 application by adding a rogue credential to it in order to use the legitimate permissions assigned to the application, such as the ability to read email, send email as an arbitrary user, access user calendars, etc., while bypassing MFA.
    “While UNC2452 has demonstrated a level of sophistication and evasiveness, the observed techniques are both detectable and defensible,” FireEye said today.
    In fact, it was FireEye’s ability to detect these techniques inside its own network that led to the company investigating an internal breach and then discovering the broader SolarWinds incident.
    Similar tools to the one FireEye released today have also been released by the US Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (called Sparrow) and CrowdStrike (called CRT).

    SolarWinds Updates More

  • in

    How to secure your Google account and keep it safe from attacks

    If your online life revolves around Gmail, Chrome, and other Google software and services, your Google account is one of your most precious online resources. That’s especially true if you use the Gmail address associated with that account as your primary email address.

    An online criminal who gets hold of those credentials can cause chaos and do catastrophic damage to your online life, which is why it’s important to protect your Google account from being compromised.
    Also: Best VPNs • Best security keys  
    In this post, I list seven steps you can take to help you lock that account down so it’s safe from online attacks. If this sounds familiar, it’s a mirror of the recommendations I published earlier for Microsoft accounts: “How to lock down your Microsoft account and keep it safe from outside attackers.” Although there are similarities between the two companies’ security tools, there are also some important differences.
    As with all things security-related, making your online assets safer from outside attack involves trade-offs with convenience. To help with that balancing act between convenience and security, I’ve divided the steps into three groups, based on how tightly you want to lock down your Google account.
    (And please note that the steps described in this article are about personal accounts associated with free Gmail addresses. Google’s paid business services, including Google Workspace, are managed by domain administrators. Although some user configuration steps are the same, administrators can set policies that affect security settings. If your Gmail account is provided by your employer, check with them about best practices for securing that account.)
    Baseline security
    This level is sufficient for most ordinary PC users, especially those who don’t use their Gmail address as a primary factor for signing in to other sites. If you’re helping a friend or relative who’s technically unsophisticated and intimidated by passwords, this is a good option.

    At a minimum, you should create a strong password for your Google account. That password should be one that’s not used by any other account.
    In addition, you should turn on 2-step verification (Google’s term for multi-factor authentication) to protect yourself from phishing and other forms of password theft. When that feature is enabled, you have to supply an additional proof of your identity when you sign in for the first time on a new device or when you perform a high-risk activity, such as paying for an online purchase. The additional verification typically consists of a code sent as an SMS text message to a trusted device or a prompt sent to a smartphone.
    Also: Better than the best password: How to use 2FA to improve your security 
    Better security
    Those baseline precautions are adequate, but you can tighten security significantly with a couple extra steps.
    First, set up your smartphone as an authentication factor, using an app such as Google Authenticator. You can also sign in on a smartphone using your Google account, which automatically enables it to receive prompts for use as a sign-in and verification option. Then remove the option for using SMS text messages to verify your identity.
    With that configuration, you can still use your mobile phone as an authentication factor, but a would-be attacker won’t be able to intercept text messages or spoof your phone number.
    Also: Microsoft urges users to stop using phone-based multi-factor authentication 
    Maximum security
    For the most extreme security, add at least one physical hardware key along with the Google Authenticator app and, optionally, remove personal email addresses as a backup verification factor. That configuration places significant roadblocks in the way of even the most determined attacker.
    This configuration requires an extra investment in hardware and it definitely adds some friction to the sign-in process, but it’s by far the most effective way to secure your Google account.
    Also: Best security keys in 2020: Hardware-based two-factor authentication 
    STEP 1: CREATE A NEW, STRONG PASSWORD
    First things first: You need a strong, unique password for your Google account. The best way to ensure that you’ve nailed this requirement is to use your password manager’s tools to generate a brand-new password.
    (No password manager? Try an online option like the 1Password Strong Password Generator or the LastPass Password Generator Tool.)
    Generating a new password ensures that your account credentials are not shared with any other account; it also guarantees that an older password that you might have inadvertently reused isn’t part of a password breach.
    To change your password, go to the Google Account Security page at https://myaccount.google.com/security. Sign in, if necessary, then click Password (under the Signing In To Google heading) and follow the prompts to change your password.
    Also: The best password managers for business: 1Password, Keeper, LastPass, and more 

    Make sure the password you enter here is strong and isn’t used for any other online account.
    Follow the instructions to save the new password using your password manager. Feel free to write it down, if you prefer a physical backup. Just make sure to store the paper in a secure location, such as a locked file drawer or a safe.
    STEP 2: TURN ON TWO-STEP VERIFICATION
    Don’t leave the Google Account Security page just yet. Instead, scroll up to the Two-Step Verification section and make sure this option is turned on. Use the default option to receive codes via text message on a mobile phone you personally own. (You can set up other, more advanced forms of verification as well, but we’ll get to those later.)
    The setup process is a fairly straightforward wizard that confirms you are able to receive verification messages. After it’s complete, stay on that page for the next step.

    Basic 2-step verification uses SMS text messages, which are adequate for low-risk accounts.
    STEP 3: PRINT OUT RECOVERY CODES
    Next step is to save a set of recovery codes. Having access to one of these codes will allow you to sign in to your account if you’ve forgotten the password or if you’ve lost your phone. Without this backup, you risk being permanently locked out.
    On the Google Account Security page, find the Backup Codes option and click Set Up. That opens a pop-up dialog box like the one shown here, containing 10 codes that you can use when you’re prompted for a second verification factor. Print out that page and file it away in the same locked file cabinet or safe where you put your password.

      Print out a set of recovery codes and store them in a safe place where you can find them quickly if you lose access to your account.
    Note that you can return to this page at any time to see your list of backup codes and print a fresh copy. Codes can only be used one time, and will be indicated as “Already used” if you reprint the list. Generating a new batch of codes renders the old batch invalid.
    And now for some more advanced security options.
    STEP 4: ADD A RECOVERY EMAIL ADDRESS
    Registering a recovery email address is an important security precaution. In the event that Google detects suspicious activity on your account, you’ll receive a notification at this address.
    Having a recovery email is also helpful if you forget your password. When two-step verification is enabled, resetting your password requires at least two forms of verification, such as a printed backup code and a code from an email message sent to a registered email account. You’ll need to supply both of those forms of identification or you risk being permanently locked out.
    Go back to the Google Account Security page and click Recovery Email (under the Ways We Can Verify It’s You heading). Enter or change the recovery email address. You’ll receive a notification at that address to confirm that it’s available for recovery,
    Which address should you use here? A free backup email address, such as a Microsoft Outlook.com account, is acceptable if your security needs are minimal. A better option is a business email address, which is under the control of an administrator and is more difficult to hack into than a personal account.
    Also: Best email hosting services in 2020: G Suite, Microsoft 365, and more options 
    STEP 5: SET UP YOUR SMARTPHONE AS AN AUTHENTICATOR
    When you register your smartphone as a trusted device, Google gives you two ways to use it for authentication purposes.
    If you use an Android device that’s signed in using your Google account, you can sign in to any Google service by responding to prompts from Google. This option doesn’t require any extra setup.
    On an iPhone or iPad, you need to download the Google or Gmail app, sign in with your Google account, and turn on push notifications. (Full instructions are on this Google Support page: “Sign in with Google prompts.”)
    In addition, you can use Google Authenticator or another smartphone app that generates Time-based One-time Password Algorithm (TOTP) codes for multi-factor authentication. I highly recommend using one of these apps for any service that supports them. (For more on these options, see “Protect yourself: How to choose the right two-factor authenticator app.”)
    To set up Google Authenticator (or another authenticator app) for use with a Google account, go to the Google Account 2-Step Verification page. Under the Authenticator App heading, click Set Up. (If you’re replacing your phone, click Change Phone). Install the app, if necessary, and then follow the prompts to add your account using the bar code that the authenticator app displays.

    After installing an authenticator app, use this barcode to set up your Google account to generate TOTP codes.
    STEP 6: REMOVE SMS TEXT MESSAGES AS A FORM OF VERIFICATION
    By this point, you should have more than enough secure ways to authenticate yourself and verify your identity. That means it’s time to remove the weakest link in the chain: SMS text messages.
    What makes SMS text messages so problematic from a security point of view is the reality that an attacker can hijack your mobile account. It happened to my ZDNet colleague Matthew Miller a few years ago, and I wouldn’t wish that nightmare on anyone. (For details and some additional security advice, see “Protect your online identity now: Fight hackers with these 5 security safeguards.”)
    Before you change this setting, confirm that you have at least two alternative forms of verification (a secure email address and the Google Authenticator app, for example) and that you’ve saved backup codes for the account. Then, from the Google Account 2-Step Verification page, go to the Voice Or Text Message section. There, you’ll find entries for each of the phone numbers registered as 2FA factors for your account.
    Click the pencil icon to the right of a number to open its properties and click Remove Phone to eliminate its entry. Repeat for other numbers you want to remove.
    STEP 7: USE A HARDWARE SECURITY KEY FOR AUTHENTICATION

      Using a hardware key, you can sign in to your Google account with a tap.
    This step is the most advanced of all. It requires an investment in extra hardware, but the requirement to insert a device into a USB port or make a connection via Bluetooth or NFC adds the highest level of security.
    For an overview of how this type of hardware works, see “YubiKey hands-on: Hardware-based 2FA is more secure, but watch out for these gotchas.”
    To configure a hardware key, go to the Google Account 2-Step Verification page, click Add Security Key, and then follow the prompts.
    You’ll need to enter the PIN for your hardware key, then touch to activate it. When that setup is complete, you’ve got a powerful way to sign in to any service powered by your Google account without having to fuss with passwords.
    As I mentioned at the start of this article, most people don’t need this level of advanced protection. But if your Google Drive account includes valuable documents like tax returns and bank statements, you’ll want to lock it down as tightly as possible. More

  • in

    Protective DNS aims to protect remote workers from malware attack

    Remote working has put people at risk of being targeted by cyber criminals because home networks are rarely set up with enterprise-level security in mind. But a new tool could give home workers the same protections against cyberattacks as they’re used to in the office.
    The UK’s National Cyber Security Centre’s (NCSC) Protective Domain Name Service (PDNS) has been active since 2017, helping to keep public sector workers as safe as possible from cyberattacks – and now there’s a version for remote workers.

    More on privacy

    PDNS is designed to stop the use of DNS for spreading and operating malware, ransomware and other cyber threats by preventing the browser from finding websites that have been identified as malicious – ultimately, if you’re working from a public sector building, your computer is protected by PDNS.
    SEE: A winning strategy for cybersecurity (ZDNet special report) | Download the report as a PDF (TechRepublic)
    However, the COVID-19 pandemic forced many employers to send their their employees to work from home and the public sector is no different in that regard, with remote working suddenly becoming the new norm.
    That meant that government employees suddenly found themselves outside of protected networks and more vulnerable to hackers and malware because they’re not protected by PDNS at home – so their networks could find and connect to malicious sites if the user was exposed to one.
    With this in mind, the NCSC – in partnership with Nominet – released a free tool that enables remote workers across the public sector to stay safe with PDNS from home.

    The PDNS Digital Roaming application for Windows 10 detects when a device is being used outside of an enterprise network and redirects DNS traffic to PDNS using an encrypted DNS over HTTPS (DoH) protocol. It offers users the same protections against malware and other cyber threats as they’d have when connecting from the corporate network.
    SEE: How do we stop cyber weapons from getting out of control?
    PDNS Digital Roaming is available to all public sector staff, even if they weren’t using it on enterprise networks previously. The NCSC notes that PDNS isn’t a VPN but a “lightweight application” that encrypts and redirects DNS traffic to keep users safe.
    “By installing it on their device, staff can ensure that their DNS traffic is being directed to the PDNS and is thus protected by this innovative service,” said David Carroll, MD of Nominet’s NTX Cyber division.
    “Solutions like the PDNS help to secure the critical infrastructure that our nation relies on, the organisations that house our most personal records, and the institutions that we turn to in our hours of most need,” he added.
    MORE ON CYBERSECURITY More

  • in

    Livecoin slams its doors shut after failing to recover from hack, financial loss

    Livecoin has announced its closure following a cyberattack that allegedly compromised the firm’s infrastructure and exchange rate setup. 

    As previously reported by ZDNet, the Russian cryptocurrency exchange claimed it had been hacked roughly around Christmas, with the alleged cyberattackers seizing control of Livecoin systems in order to tamper with exchange rate values. 
    Bitcoin (BTC) exchange rates were changed from $23,000 at the time to over $450,000, and Ethereum grew from $600 to $15,000. Smaller cryptocurrency rates were also impacted. 
    As Livecoin asked users to stop all activity, the threat actors began cashing out, reaping profit in the process. 
    Livecoin claimed to have lost control of its “servers, backend, and nodes,” and was unable to stop the attack from occurring. The cryptocurrency exchange said law enforcement had been notified of the security incident. 
    It has not yet been a full month since the alleged cyberattack and Livecoin is closing its doors permanently, citing damage in “technical and financial way[s]” for the decision. 
    In an announcement posted to livecoin.news, the organization said there is “no way” to continue operations and any “remaining funds” will be paid to customers. 

    Fund recovery plans or amounts are not yet public, beyond claimants being required to email the cryptocurrency exchange directly with their usernames and registration dates. Livecoin says that claims can be filed until March 17, 2021. 
    As noted by Coin Telegraph, one apparent user of the service has posted what is claimed to be an extensive list of documentation and personal information to verify claimant identities, including passport/ID scans, selfies, places of residence, primary device data for logging in to Livecoin, and video footage. On Twitter, the request for this vast array of personal data has prompted speculation around its legitimacy.
    “We apologize for an existing situation and ask you to keep calm, including your conversation with support officers,” Livecoin added. “Our service and team bear hard losses as well as our clients. In case of abuse and threats in conversation, the claim can be declined.”
    Livecoin’s old website domain displays the message below, but no comment has been made concerning any potential ransomware attack.

    Livecoin’s Telegram chat is currently alight with speculation. Some have suggested that an exit scam is in play, which is a popular method for cryptocurrency exchange operators to vanish with user funds while claiming external cyberattackers have stolen cryptocurrencies held by a victim organization.
    Previous and related coverage
    Have a tip? Get in touch securely via WhatsApp | Signal at +447713 025 499, or over at Keybase: charlie0 More

  • in

    Fourth malware strain discovered in SolarWinds incident

    Image via Ben Maguire
    Cyber-security firm Symantec said it identified another malware strain that was used during the SolarWinds supply chain attack, bringing the total number to four, after the likes of Sunspot, Sunburst (Solorigate), and Teardrop.

    SolarWinds Updates

    Named Raindrop, Symantec said the malware was used only during the very last stages of an intrusion, deployed only on the networks of very few selected targets.
    Symantec said it encountered only four Raindrop samples in the cases it investigated until today.
    Also: Best VPNs • Best security keys • Best antivirus 
    Timeline of the SolarWinds supply chain attack
    But to understand Raindrop’s role and position in these attacks, we must first go over the timeline of the entire SolarWinds incident.
    Based on reports and information published by Microsoft, FireEye, CrowdStrike, and others, the SolarWinds intrusion is believed to have taken place in mid-2019 when hackers, believed to be linked to the Russian government, breached the internal network of SolarWinds, a Texas-based software maker.
    The intruders first deployed the Sunspot malware, which they used exclusively inside SolarWinds’ own network. CrowdStrike said the attackers used the malware to modify the build process of the SolarWinds Orion app and insert the Sunburst (Solorigate) malware inside new versions of Orion, an IT inventory management system.

    These trojanized Orion versions went undetected and were active on the official SolarWinds update servers between March and June 2020. Companies who applied Orion updates also unwittingly installed the Sunburst malware on their systems.
    But the Sunburst malware wasn’t particularly complex and didn’t do much except gather info about the infected network and send the data to a remote server.
    Even if around 18,000 SolarWinds customers got themselves infected with the Sunburst malware, the Russian hacking group carefully selected its targets and opted to escalate attacks only in a handful of cases, for the likes of high-profile targets such as US government agencies, Microsoft, or security firm FireEye.
    When hackers decided to “escalate their access,” they used Sunburst to download and install the Teardrop malware [see past reports from Symantec and Check Point].
    Raindrop — Teardrop’s sibling
    But Symantec says that in some cases, the hackers chose to deploy the Raindrop malware strain instead of the more widely used Teardrop.
    Despite being different strains, Symantec said the two backdoors had similar functionality, which the company described as being “a loader for [the] Cobalt Strike Beacon,” which the intruders later used to escalate and broaden their access inside a hacked IT network.
    But while both Raindrop and Teardrop were used for the same purpose, Symantec said that some differences also exist between the two, most being under the hood, at the code level, best described in the table below:

    Image: Symantec
    The other major difference is how the two malware strains were deployed. 
    Symantec said that the more widely used Teardrop was installed directly by the Sunburst malware, while Raindrop mysteriously appeared on systems where Sunburst was also found, with no direct evidence that Sunburst triggered its installation.
    The US security firm said it’s currently investigating how Raindrop was installed.
    The most obvious avenue is found in previous reports on the SolarWinds hacks that mentioned that hackers also used the Sunburst malware to run various fileless PowerShell payloads, many of which would leave minimal forensic evidence on infected hosts. While unconfirmed, it may be possible that Raindrop is the result of these operations.
    But the lesson here is that security teams investigating SolarWinds incidents inside their networks now also need to scan for the presence of another malware strain — Raindrop.
    The Symantec report released today includes indicators of compromise (IOCs) that the security firm has seen in the cases it investigated. More

  • in

    Microsoft Defender is boosting its response to malware attacks by changing a key setting

    Microsoft says it is stepping up security for users of Microsoft Defender for Endpoint by changing a key setting, switching the default from optional automatic malware fixes to fully automatic remediation. 
    The change means that when Microsoft Defender for Endpoint detects malware on PCs on a network, the antivirus will automatically start analyzing all threats that are related to the alert, poring over files, processes, services, registry keys and all other areas where a threat could reside. 

    More on privacy

    “The result of an automated investigation started by an alert is a list of related entities found on a device and their verdicts (malicious, suspicious, or clean),” Microsoft explains on a blogpost. 
    SEE: Security Awareness and Training policy (TechRepublic Premium)
    “For any malicious entity, the investigation will create a remediation action, an action that, when approved, will remove or contain a malicious entity that was found in the investigation. These actions are defined, managed, and executed by Microsoft Defender for Endpoint without the security operations team having to remotely connect to the device.”
    The actions taken depend on what level of device automation has been configured. Previously, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint customers that opted into public previews were put on “Semi”, which required approval for any remediation. Soon, they’ll be moved to the “Full” configuration, which allows for Windows 10 to remediate threats automatically. 
    With the setting at Semi, administrators might have more control, but as Microsoft points out, admins may lose valuable time to halt the malware from causing further damage, such as affecting other PCs. 

    Microsoft has made some improvements to its automated malware detection since first releasing it. First, it’s boosted malware detection accuracy, so there should be fewer infections and false-positives. Additionally, it’s now got better automated investigation capabilities. 
    “We have seen thousands of cases where organizations with fully automated tenants have successfully contained and remediated threats, while other companies, left with the default ‘semi’ level, have remained at high risk due to lengthy pending time for approval of actions,” the blog warned.
    SEE: Windows 10 toolbar: Here’s how Microsoft is adding news, weather and traffic
    According to Microsoft, customers using full automation have had “40% more high-confidence malware samples removed than customers using lower levels of automation.” 
    This should leave security operations centers with more free time to deal with malware threats that require human intervention. 
    From February 16, 2021, Microsoft will automatically upgrade organizations that opted for public previews in the Microsoft Defender for Endpoint to “Full-remediate threats automatically”. More