More stories

  • in

    Borat RAT malware: A 'unique' triple threat that is far from funny

    Cyble
    A new Remote Access Trojan (RAT) might have an amusing name to some, but its capabilities show the malware to be no laughing matter.

    ZDNet Recommends

    The best security key

    While robust passwords help you secure your valuable online accounts, hardware-based two-factor authentication takes that security to the next level.

    Read More

    Dubbed Borat RAT, Cyble Research Labs said in a recent malware analysis that the new threat doesn’t settle for standard remote access capabilities; instead, Borat RAT also includes spyware and ransomware functions.According to the cybersecurity researchers, the Trojan, named after the character adopted by comedian Sacha Baron Cohen, is offered for sale to cybercriminals in underground forums. Borat RAT has a centralized dashboard and is packaged up with a builder, feature modules, and a server certificate. The malware’s capabilities are vast and include a keylogger, a ransomware encryption and decryption component — as well as the option for users to generate their own ransom notes — and an optionally distributed denial-of-service (DDoS) feature for “disrupting the normal traffic of a targeted server,” according to Cyble. Some of Borat RAT’s marketed capabilities
    Cyble
    The use of ‘RAT’ in the name is a clue to the remote and surveillance features of the malicious software. Borat RAT can remotely record a machine’s audio by compromising its microphone, capture webcam footage and also contains a host of remote control options: hijacking a mouse or keyboard, performing screen captures, tamping with system settings, and both stealing and deleting files.Borat RAT utilizes process hollowing for compromising legitimate processes on a target machine and may also enable reverse proxies to stay under the radar when performing malicious activities. The malware will harvest data, including operating system information, before sending it to an attacker-controlled command-and-control (C2) server. Furthermore, Borat RAT will hone in on browser information such as cookies, browser histories, bookmarks and favorites, and account credentials. Browsers such as Chrome and Chromium-based Microsoft Edge are impacted. Discord tokens, too, can be stolen. Cyble says that the malware can also perform other functions to “disturb” its victims, including playing audio, swapping mouse buttons, showing or hiding a desktop and taskbar, freezing the mouse, tampering with webcam lights, turning off a monitor, and more. Despite its name, remote control, spyware, and ransomware capabilities make Borat RAT a potent malware strain worth watching. Cyble intends to monitor the development of the “unique” malware in the future.  See alsoHave a tip? Get in touch securely via WhatsApp | Signal at +447713 025 499, or over at Keybase: charlie0 More

  • in

    Turkey seeks 40,000-year sentences for alleged cryptocurrency exit scammers

    Turkey is pursuing colossal sentences of over 40,000 years for suspects allegedly connected to a fraudulent cryptocurrency exchange.A prosecutor seeks sentences of up to 40,564 years each for 21 individuals accused of operating Thodex, a now-defunct cryptocurrency exchange.

    As reported by Demiroren via Bloomberg, the alleged founders and executives of Thodex are in the prosecutor’s line of sight. The indictment, issued Thursday, names Faruk Fatih Ozer, the 28-year-old CEO of the cryptocurrency exchange who vanished a year ago. A notice was posted on the Thodex website in April 2021, informing users that the trading post would be closed for several days to deal with a “sales” process. The cryptocurrency exchange never reopened, and investors could not access their accounts or withdraw funds. Thodex claimed on social media that no one had been scammed or had lost their money. However, many accused the exchange of performing an exit scam. At the time, Thodex called the accusations “baseless” and no more than a “smear campaign.”While reports, at the time, estimated losses in the billions of dollars, the indictment has revised this figure to closer to $24 million. Ozer, who was reportedly last spotted in the same month the cryptocurrency exchange closed while boarding a flight to Albania from Istanbul airport, has been issued an international arrest warrant. The CEO claimed he was meeting investors abroad. Interpol has published a Red Notice for Ozer. The Turkish national is wanted for “establishing organizations for the purpose of committing crimes [and] aggravated fraud,” according to the law enforcement agency. Ozer is still missing, despite assurances made last year that he would return to his home country to co-operate with local authorities. Cryptocurrency is a popular fiscal outlet for many members of the younger Turkish generation due to Turkey’s economic problems and the volatile lira. The trend has concerned Turkish financial authorities for years, with clampdowns being discussed, but citizens continue to pursue potential crypto profits in stablecoins — as well as fiat currencies, including the US dollar. Last month, two alleged operators of a rug pull non-fungible token (NFT) scam were arrested by US law enforcement. The two 20-year-old suspects have been charged for running Frosties, an NFT project which raised approximately $1.1 million before an exit scam allegedly took place, leaving investors out of pocket. The US Department of Justice (DoJ) has imposed fraud-related charges. See alsoHave a tip? Get in touch securely via WhatsApp | Signal at +447713 025 499, or over at Keybase: charlie0 More

  • in

    Two teenagers charged in connection with investigation into hacking group, says City of London police

    The City of London police has said two teenagers have been charged in connection with an investigation into a hacking group.”The City of London Police has been conducting an investigation into members of a hacking group. Two teenagers, a 16-year-old and a 17-year-old, have been charged in connection with this investigation and remain in police custody,” said Detective Inspector Michael O’Sullivan, from the City of London Police. Both teenagers have been charged with three counts of unauthorised access to a computer with intent to impair the reliability of data, one count of fraud by false representation and one count of unauthorised access to a computer with intent to hinder access to data. The 16-year-old has also been charged with one count of causing a computer to perform a function to secure unauthorised access to a program, according to The City of London Police. More

  • in

    Modem-wiping malware was behind Viasat cyberattack

    Satellite operator Viasat has confirmed that destructive malware was behind the problems with end-user modems in Ukraine and parts of Europe on the day Russia invaded Ukraine. SentinalLabs researchers Juan Andres Guerrero-Saade and Max van Amerongen have detailed their discovery of a new destructive malware variant they call “AcidRain” — a Linux file format (ELF) binary designed to wipe modems and routers — that they contend knocked out thousands of Vista’s KA-SAT routers on February 24.  AcidRain is the latest destructive malware discovered since Russia’s invasion on February 24, including WhisperGate, HermeticWiper, CaddyWiper, IssacWiper, and DoubleZero. SentinalLabs says AcidRain shares some similarities with stage 3 component of VPNFilter — the malware that Ukraine blocked in 2018 fearing an attack on its critical infrastructure and which prompted the FBI that year to tell everyone to reboot their routers to remove the malware. The security company released its findings on AcidRain on the heels of Viasat’s March 30 account of the February outage, which preceded an outage of Germany energy firm Enercon’s remote communication system to 5,800 wind turbines.    Viasat at the time confirmed the attack was not on the satellite network itself but was a denial of service attack from SurfBeam2 and SurfBeam2+ modems located within the Ukraine that knocked KA-SAT modems offline.  Viasat yesterday said the attack was localized to a single, consumer-oriented partition of the KA-SAT network operated on Viasat’s behalf by a Eutelsat subsidiary, Skylogic. It didn’t impact Viasat’s directly managed mobility or government users on the KA-SAT satellite, nor did it affect users on other Viasat networks, it said. The company noted that “destructive commands overwrote key data in flash memory on the modems, rendering the modems unable to access the network, but not permanently unusable.”Viasat also said the attackers exploited a misconfigured VPN appliance to gain remote access to access the management segment of the KA-SAT network, then moved onto a portion used to manage and operate the network, before executing “legitimate, targeted management commands” on residential modems. SentinalLabs researchers put forward another idea: a supply chain attack, where the attackers somehow used a KA-SAT management mechanism to push the wiper to targeted modems and routers.  “The threat actor used the KA-SAT management mechanism in a supply-chain attack to push a wiper designed for modems and routers. A wiper for this kind of device would overwrite key data in the modem’s flash memory, rendering it inoperable and in need of reflashing or replacing,” SentinalLabs notes.  The SentinalLabs researchers spotted a MIPS ELF binary with the name ‘ukrop’ on VirusTotal that was uploaded on March 15.”Only the incident responders in the Viasat case could say definitively whether this was in fact the malware used in this particular incident,” they add. A Viasat spokesperson told ZDNet that the facts in SentinalLabs’ report were accurate and lined up with its own report, however Viasat disagrees that this was a supply chain attack.   “The facts provided in the Viasat Incident Report yesterday are accurate. The analysis in the SentinelLabs report regarding the ukrop binary is consistent with the facts in our report – specifically, SentinelLabs identifies the destructive executable that was run on the modems using a legitimate management command as Viasat previously described.””We don’t view this as a supply chain attack or vulnerability,” the spokesperson said. Per Viasat’s Thursday report: “Viasat has no evidence that standard modem software or firmware distribution or update processes involved in normal network operations were used or compromised in the attack.” Further, “there is no evidence that any end-user data was accessed or compromised.”The FBI and Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) recently warned all SATCOM operators and their customers to review its guidance for protecting against attacks on satellite networks and very small-aperture terminal (VSAT) networks.   More

  • in

    FBI: Ransomware attacks are piling up the pressure on public services

    Ransomware attacks are creating risks to safety by disrupting public services including utilities, emergency services and education, the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) has warned. The alert says that local government agencies are attractive targets for cyber criminals to hit with ransomware, because they oversee critical services on which the public depends. Ransomware attacks against local governments have caused disruptions to healthcare, emergency services and safety operations, and have seen sensitive personal data stolen by hackers, putting individuals at further risk of fraud and cybercrime. The attacks targeting local services show no signs of slowing down. 

    ZDNet Recommends

    “In the next year, local US government agencies almost certainly will continue to experience ransomware attacks, particularly as malware deployment and targeting tactics evolve, further endangering public health and safety, and resulting in significant financial liabilities,” warned the alert, which details how several ransomware attacks over the past year have caused disruption to vital everyday services. SEE: Windows 11 security: How to protect your home and small business PCsFor example, the FBI details how a January 2022 ransomware attack forced a US county to take computer systems offline, close public offices and obliged it to run emergency response operations on backup contingencies.  The attack also knocked out county jail surveillance cameras, data collection capabilities, internet access, and deactivated automated doors, resulting in safety concerns and a facility lockdown. Another ransomware incident against local government services in September 2021 led to a county courthouse being closed and cyber criminals stealing personal information about residents and employees. The hackers published the data on the dark web after the county refused to pay the ransom. In May 2021, a PayOrGrief ransomware attack infected local US county government systems, making servers inaccessible and disrupting online services, including the ability to book COVID-19 vaccination appointments. The attackers claimed to have stolen 2.5GB of data containing internal documents and personal information. The examples of cyberattacks detailed in the alert represent just a small fraction of the total number of ransomware incidents against government services during the past year alone – and only higher education and academia were more common victims for ransomware attacks during 2021. While the FBI and other law enforcement agencies say victims of ransomware attacks shouldn’t pay the ransom demand for a decryption key because it just encourages further attacks, in many cases the victims will pay because they feel as if it’s the quickest way to restore vital services – it’s why criminals target public services. But even if victims pay the ransom, restoring the network is an arduous task – and there’s no guarantee that the decryption key will work properly, or that the ransomware gangs won’t return with more attacks. Whether the victim pays the ransom or not, the FBI urges US organisations to report ransomware incidents as it could help prevent future attacks against others. SEE: A winning strategy for cybersecurity (ZDNet special report) The FBI has listed several cybersecurity measures that organisations can implement to help avoid becoming the victim of a ransomware attack. These include keeping operating systems and software up to date with security patches, so cyber criminals can’t exploit known vulnerabilities to access networks, and to require strong, unique passwords for online accounts, so it’s trickier for hackers to guess passwords. It’s also recommended that organisations require multi-factor authentication for online services including webmail, VPNs and accounts with access to critical systems, in order to provide an additional barrier against attacks. Organisations should also keep offline backups of data and ensure they’re regularly updated and tested, so in the event of a ransomware attack, it’s possible to restore the network without paying cyber criminals for a decryption key. MORE ON CYBERSECURITY More

  • in

    Chinese hackers Deep Panda return with Log4Shell exploits, new Fire Chili rootkit

    Deep Panda has launched new attacks this month that exploit Log4Shell to deploy the new Fire Chili rootkit.Deep Panda is a Chinese advanced persistent threat (APT) hacking group that has been active for at least a decade. The APT targets government, defense, healthcare, telecoms, and financial organizations, to name a few, for purposes including data theft and surveillance.

    The cyberattackers have a wide range of malicious tools, including the Milestone backdoor and the Infoadmin Remote Access Trojan (RAT) based on Gh0st RAT code. There may also be affiliation to Winnti, a separate Chinese group known to target game developers and vendors. A new campaign detected by FortiGuard Labs researchers is the work of Deep Panda, which is targeting organizations in the finance, travel, and cosmetic industries. During the past month, FortiGuard has detected the group’s active exploitation of Log4Shell, a critical vulnerability in the Apache Log4J Java logging library (CVE-2021-44228, CVSS 10.0), to spread a new, “novel” rootkit. Attackers from various groups use Log4Shell to compromise VMware Horizon servers for data exfiltration and cryptojacking. In Deep Panda’s case, the new rootkit, dubbed Fire Chili, is designed to keep activities under the radar and is deployed alongside the Milestone backdoor. Fire Chili has been signed with a stolen digital certificate — the same used by Winnti to sign-off malicious tools — and will check to ensure the victim machine is not running in safe mode. “It then checks the operating system version,” the researchers say. “The rootkit uses Direct Kernel Object Modification (DKOM), which involves undocumented kernel structures and objects, for its operations. For this reason, it relies on specific OS builds as otherwise, it may cause the infected machine to crash.”The latest supported build is Windows 10 Creators Update (Redstone 2). Drivers are implemented to hide malicious objects from existing security systems. The rootkit will also tamper with the registry to stop malicious processes from being terminated, and a callback is generated to disguise newly-created processes from utilities including Task Manager. The researchers collected four-driver samples, both 32-bit and 64-bit, compiled in 2017. The samples were signed with stolen certificates issued by U.S. and Korean gaming companies. In addition, the malware can hide registry keys and TCP network connections. The Milestone backdoor is then installed on the target machine for ongoing data theft and persistence. The researchers also discovered a dropper containing a Milestone loader.”Although both Deep Panda and Winnti are known to use rootkits as part of their toolset, Fire Chili is a novel strain with a unique code base different from the ones previously affiliated with the groups,” FortiGuard says. “The reason these tools are linked to two different groups is unclear at this time. It’s possible that the groups’ developers shared resources, such as stolen certificates and C2 infrastructure, with each other.”See alsoHave a tip? Get in touch securely via WhatsApp | Signal at +447713 025 499, or over at Keybase: charlie0 More

  • in

    SunVia bets that controlling your own identity will make the metaverse successful

    Getty Images
    Startup SunVia believes that managing your own identity will be critical to the future metaverse. Identification will be the most important component in making the digital future work, and personal IDs will help individuals gain control of their data — taking it away from the big platforms. 

    “Over the past 10 to 15 years, people’s digital identity has grown in importance; everyone now has a much larger digital life,” says Jay Williams, President and CTO of SunVia. “People want to be able to control their personal data and manage who has access to that data.”The current political sentiment is focusing on curbing corporate access to personal data through new privacy laws, such as those in California. Advertisers are finding it increasingly difficult to target individuals with relevant messages, but SunVia is betting there’s a solution to satisfy the stakeholders in this sensitive subject of data privacy.What is needed, Williams says, is a more ethical relationship between consumers and advertisers, specifically regarding how personal data can be used. SunVia is working on tools that will help create that ethical relationship by enabling people to manage their personal data and grant or deny access to it.Currently, there is no easy way for individuals to check the accuracy of personal data — or to control who profits from that data. Yet there’s a $100 billion advertising industry that relies on that data. It creates billions of dollars in profits for the vendors of personal data, and there’s a clear imbalance here with value being lost to third-parties. Williams believes that there needs to be new legislation to guarantee individual rights, and that legal code needs to be reflected in software code. The California Data Privacy laws show a strong shift to increasing an individual’s control over their data, and other states are introducing similar legislation. California residents, for example, can demand a company to reveal how it’s using their personal data and if that data has been sold. California’s tough approach, along with large punitive fines, is likely to limit the collection of personal data. Many organizations will conclude that the cost of generating data reports for individuals will eclipse any benefits from collecting that data.Less personal data creates a problem with targeting advertising. With SunVia, however, this problem is solved because consumers will own their data and manage the commercial messages they see. “Brands still want to have a direct and meaningful relationship with consumers, and this will be enabled through our platform. It will be based on ethical licenses,” explains Williams.For Williams and his colleague John Humphrey, Chief Revenue Officer at SunVia, almost everything about the digital future requires the need for verifiable IDs.”In 2020, during the lockdowns, the world crossed the Rubicon with 52% of the population with at least one online account; we’ve come even further now,” says Humphrey. “With individuals typically having multiple online accounts — and the introduction of new digital markets, such as trading NFTs — the need for verifiable IDs is critical to market growth.”SunVia has begun to roll out some of its technology and is looking for participants for Protagonist, an alpha version of what will become The Metaverse Operations Manager.SunVia recently published an article that reads like a manifesto and a call to action. Here is an excerpt: “… the Platforms own our identity. We gave it to them in exchange for some trinkets. They now own the most important and scarce resource on the planet. Ourselves.”People are not here to be used. We are not Consumers to be classified, sliced, diced, and resold to brands to fuel more consumption. We are Producers. We are Creators. We are the Brands. We are now the drivers of the economy.” It later adds, “We need a Decentralized Autonomous Association (DAA) to allow us to own ourselves and our information. This is the next economy. The Relationship Economy. Come join us.”You can read SunVia’s “Origin of the Relationship Economy” here.

    Social Networking More

  • in

    Is it OK to use text messages for 2-factor authentication? [Ask ZDNet]

    Welcome to the first installment of a new weekly advice column, Ask ZDNet. It’s a time-honored editorial format, like Dear Abby but with a much better grasp of modern tech. This week, we tackle three thorny questions: Are text messages too dangerous to use as a second factor for 2FA? Do you really need Windows 11 Pro edition? And why do smoke detector batteries always seem to die in the middle of the night? If you’ve got a question about any of the topics ZDNet covers, one of our team of editors and contributors probably has an answer. If they don’t, we’ll find an outside expert who can steer you in the right direction. Questions can cover just about any topic that’s remotely related to work and technology, including PCs and Macs, mobile devices, security and privacy, social media, home office gear, consumer electronics, business etiquette, financial advice … well, you get the idea. Send your questions to ask@zdnet.com. Due to the volume of submissions, we can’t guarantee a personal reply, but we do promise to read every letter and respond right here to the ones that we think our readers will care about. Ask away. 

    Is it OK to use text messages for 2-factor authentication?

    I know I’m supposed to use 2-factor authentication for everything, but I keep reading that using text messages for 2FA is dangerous. Do I really need to worry about this? What are my alternatives?

    First things first: Yes, setting up 2FA is a crucial security step for any important online account. When this form of authentication is enabled, you need to provide a second proof of your identity when signing in to an online service for the first time on a device. If your password is stolen in an online data breach or someone fools you into giving it up, the attacker can’t access your account because they don’t have access to a second authentication factor. (For a detailed explainer, see “Multi-factor authentication: How to enable 2FA to step up your security.”) The most basic form of 2FA involves a text message, sent via SMS to a phone you previously registered with your account. After you type in your password, you receive a text message with a code that you enter as the final step of authenticating. SMS-based 2FA is absolutely better than no 2FA. But it’s vulnerable to a variety of attacks, including SIM swapping, where the bad guy is able to intercept the SMS messages and take over the account. This type of attack takes a great deal of work and is most likely to target a high value account, like someone who works at the support desk for a big corporation. But even if you aren’t a target for a global hacking network, it’s smart to steer clear of SMS authentication whenever you can.There are two great alternatives to SMS-based 2FA codes. First is a free authenticator app, which generates 2FA codes or receives approval prompts directly on your phone. (For details, see “Protect yourself: How to choose the right two-factor authenticator app.”) For maximum security, consider a physical hardware key that you connect using USB or NFC. Hardware keys cost more and aren’t as easy to use, but they’re ideal for high-value accounts that need extra protection. (See “YubiKey hands-on: Hardware-based 2FA is more secure, but watch out for these gotchas.”) 

    Where are all the PCs with Windows 11 Pro?

    I’m ready to buy a new PC, but all of the computers I see for sale at my local retail outlets are running Windows 11 Home edition. Do I need to upgrade to Pro? How do I do that without spending a fortune?

     As you’ve noticed, the PC industry is extremely price-sensitive. The reason you see so many PCs running Windows Home edition is because it costs the PC makers less than the Pro edition, which in turn allows them to cut the price tag on a PC model by about $100. For most consumers, Home edition is good enough. Businesses that run on Windows enterprise networks need Pro edition, however, because it’s a requirement to join a PC to a Windows domain or Azure Active Directory account and then manage that PC with Group Policy and mobile device management software. Pro edition does have a few added features you might be willing to pay for, especially if you’re planning to use your PC for business. It supports full BitLocker encryption without requiring the user to sign in to a Microsoft account. It also allows the use of Windows Information Protection features for secure document sharing. You get to use the full Hyper-V virtualization platform to create and run virtual machines. You can configure Pro edition to be a remote desktop server, allowing you to connect to it remotely from another Windows PC (even one running Home edition) or from a Mac or a mobile device. Instead of installing updates on Microsoft’s schedule, you can set up custom schedules for devices, deferring updates for up to 30 days while you wait for other people to experience any update-related bugs. But that’s pretty much it. If you prefer a PC that comes with Windows 11 Pro (or Windows 10 Pro, for that matter), your best bet is to look online, where you can find stores that specialize in PCs built for business. You can also go to online dealers like Dell, who will happily configure a PC to your specifications. Adding the upgrade to Windows Pro typically costs $50-80.  Or you can buy one of those PCs with Home edition installed and upgrade it yourself. If you have a license key for a Pro or Business edition of Windows 7, Windows 8.1, or Windows 10, you can use it to upgrade. (Instructions here: “How to upgrade from Windows 10 Home to Pro for free.”) You can also buy the Pro license online. The full retail price is $200 (ouch) at the Microsoft Store. You can find legitimate discounts of $50 or so from other online retailers, but be very suspicious of any discount that’s more generous than that. If you see someone offering a “lifetime license” for Windows 11 Pro for $49, there’s a good chance that the seller is not authorized to distribute that license, and there’s a chance (small, but not zero) that Microsoft could revoke your license key in the future. 

    How do I silence that chirping smoke alarm?

    The smoke alarm mounted on my bedroom ceiling started chirping again last night, waking me out of a sound sleep. I’m tempted to just disconnect it completely. Any suggestions on how to set things up so I can get an uninterrupted night’s sleep once again?

    According to the folks at Kidde, which manufactures smoke alarms, there’s actually a reason for those chirps in the night.As a smoke alarm’s battery nears the end of its life, the amount of power it produces causes an internal resistance. A drop in room temperature increases this resistance, which may impact the battery’s ability to deliver the power necessary to operate the unit in an alarm situation. This battery characteristic can cause a smoke alarm to enter the low battery chirp mode when air temperatures drop. Most homes are the coolest between 2 a.m. and 6 a.m. Now that we’ve settled, that, please don’t disconnect your smoke detector. It can literally save your life by giving you early warning of a fire so you have time to escape. Modern alarms can also detect another potential killer: the odorless but deadly carbon monoxide. The simplest fix is to set a calendar reminder to change those batteries around the same time every year, using fresh, high-quality lithium batteries. Don’t use rechargeable batteries, and don’t use batteries that have been in storage for a while. For those of us in the Northern Hemisphere, Halloween is a good date, in my experience, as it leads into the winter when windows are likely to be closed most of the time and house fires (and carbon monoxide poisoning) are statistically more likely. If you’d prefer to skip that annual chore, get batteries specifically intended for long-term use in smoke detectors and other critical devices. The Energizer Ultimate Lithium battery, for example, is designed to last 10 years, which is also how often most smoke detectors should be replaced. Just remember to set a calendar reminder for a decade from now to replace those batteries!   

    Send your questions to ask@zdnet.com. Due to the volume of submissions, we can’t guarantee a personal reply, but we do promise to read every letter and respond right here to the ones that we think our readers will care about. Be sure to include a working email address in case we have follow-up questions. We promise not to use it for any other purpose.    More