More stories

  • in

    Mission critical: How to map a forest

    It’s wild fire season in the West, and protecting the region’s forests is an urgent priority. LiDAR may soon play an important role.That’s because forest mapping is vital for forest management and ecosystem maintenance yet it has long been difficult to achieve and mostly done manually. Drawing on its established LiDAR expertise in other industries, spatial intelligence company Outsight has launched a new solution that utilizes LiDAR to automatically generate a 360° 3D map of a forest in real time and also allows on-site operators to collect data on each tree and digitally tag them, day or night.”With Outsight, we’re able to complete our surveys of the forest three times faster”, says Philippe Nolet, forestry professor at Université du Québec en Outaouais in Gatineau, Canada, where he conducts forestry monitoring research. “Then, when we’re back in the office, we have a detailed inventory of the plot with all our notes automatically tagged to each tree, saving us a huge amount of time.”The LiDAR solution is based on an easy-to-carry box that integrates the dedicated software. Using a tablet, users can collect data on the forest and each tree, individually and exhaustively, observations like exact position, characteristics, species, and presence of insects. Back at the office, they have access to a detailed inventory of the plot with all their notes automatically tagged to each tree. GPS geolocation allows operators to overlap maps.Equipped with this data, operators can arrive at data-driven forestry management tactics, including in the run-up to wildfire seasons. Because forestry management budgets are often minuscule compared to the task of managing vast plots of forest land, the ability to make confident decisions helps extend resources.Outsight’s solution is already being used by Hong Kong-based Insight Robotics, a leader in the Forestry Risk Management sector. Insight uses the LiDAR system to complete aerial surveys to better manage forests and plantations. It can also monitor the reactions of the forest ecosystem to climate change, biodiversity, deforestation, dead trees, and potentially prevent the spread of disease in trees. More

  • in

    Open-source security: Google has a new plan to stop software supply chain attacks

    To tackle the growing threat of attacks on the software supply chain, Google has proposed the Supply chain Levels for Software Artifacts framework, or SLSA which is pronounced “salsa”. Sophisticated attackers have figured out that the software supply chain is the soft underbelly of the software industry. Beyond the game-changing SolarWinds hack, Google points to the recent Codecov supply chain attack, which stung cybersecurity firm Rapid7 via a tainted Bash uploader.

    ZDNet Recommends

    While supply chain attacks aren’t new, Google notes they’ve escalated in the past year, and has shifted the focus from exploits for known or zero-day software vulnerabilities.SEE: Network security policy (TechRepublic Premium)Google describes SLSA as “an end-to-end framework for ensuring the integrity of software artifacts throughout the software supply chain.”It takes its lead from Google’s internal “Binary Authorization for Borg” (BAB) – a process Google has been using for more than eight years to verify code provenance and implement code identity. The goal of BAB is to reduce insider risk by ensuring that production software deployed at Google is properly reviewed, especially if the code has access user data, Google notes in a white paper. 

    “The goal of SLSA is to improve the state of the industry, particularly open source, to defend against the most pressing integrity threats. With SLSA, consumers can make informed choices about the security posture of the software they consume,” said Kim Lewandowski of Google’s open-source security team and Mark Lodato, from the BAB Team.  SLSA looks to lockdown everything in the software build chain, from the developer to source code, the build platform and CI/CD systems, the package repository, and dependencies. Dependencies are a major weak point for open-source software projects. In February, Google proposed new protocols for critical open-source software development that would require code reviews by two independent parties, and that maintainers use two-factor authentication.   It reckons the higher SLSA levels would have helped prevent the attack on SolarWinds’ software build system, which was compromised to install an implant that injected a backdoor during each new build. It also argues SLSA would help in the CodeCov attack because “provenance of the artifact in the GCS bucket would have shown that the artifact was not built in the expected manner from the expected source repo.”SEE: GDPR: Fines increased by 40% last year, and they’re about to get a lot biggerWhile the SLSA framework iis just a set of guidelines for now, Google envisages that its final form will go beyond best practices via enforceability. “It will support the automatic creation of auditable metadata that can be fed into policy engines to give “SLSA certification” to a particular package or build platform,” Google said. The scheme consists of four levels of SLSA, with four being the ideal state where all software development processes are protected, as pictured below. 
    Google More

  • in

    Uncovering the mysteries of milk

    Sarah Nyquist got her first introduction to biology during high school, when she took an online MIT course taught by genomics pioneer Eric Lander. Initially unsure what to expect, she quickly discovered biology to be her favorite subject. She began experimenting with anything she could find, beginning with an old PCR machine and some dining hall vegetables.

    Nyquist entered college as a biology major but soon gravitated toward the more hands-on style of the coursework in her computer science classes. Even as a computer science major and a two-time summer intern at Google, biology was never far from Nyquist’s mind. Her favorite class was taught by a computational biology professor: “It got me so excited to use computer science as a tool to interrogate biological questions,” she recalls.

    During her last two years as an undergraduate at Rice University, Nyquist also worked in a lab at Baylor College of Medicine, eventually co-authoring a paper with Eric Lander himself.

    Nyquist is now a PhD candidate studying computational and systems biology. Her work is co-advised by professors Alex Shalek and Bonnie Berger and uses machine learning to understand single-cell genomic data. Since this technology can be applied to nearly any living material, Nyquist was left to choose her focus.

    After shifting between potential thesis ideas, Nyquist finally settled on studying lactation, an important and overlooked topic in human development. She and postdoc Brittany Goods are currently part of the MIT Milk Study, the first longitudinal study to profile the cells in human breast milk using single cell genomic data. “A lot of people don’t realize there’s actually live cells in breast milk. Our research is to see what the different cell types are and what they might be doing,” Nyquist says.

    While she started out at MIT studying infectious diseases, Nyquist now enjoys investigating basic science questions about the reproductive health of people assigned female at birth. “Working on my dissertation has opened my eyes to this really important area of research. As a woman, I’ve always noticed a lot is unknown about female reproductive health,” she says. “The idea that I can contribute to that knowledge is really exciting to me.”

    The complexities of milk

    For her thesis, Nyquist and her team have sourced breast milk from over a dozen donors. These samples are provided immediately postpartum to around 40 weeks later, which provides insight into how breast milk changes over time. “We took record of the many changing environmental factors, such as if the child had started day care, if the mother had started menstruating, or if the mother had started hormonal birth control,” says Nyquist. “Any of these co-factors could explain the compositional changes we witnessed.”

    Nyquist also hypothesized that discoveries about breast milk could be a proxy for studying breast tissue. Since breast tissue is necessary for lactation, researchers have been historically struggled to collect tissue samples. “A lot is unknown about the cellular composition of human breast tissue during lactation, even though it produces an important early source of nutrition,” she adds.

    Overall, the team has found a lot of heterogeneity between donors, suggesting breast milk is more complicated than expected. They have witnessed that the cells in milk are composed primarily of a type of structural cells that increase in quantity over time. Her team hypothesized that this transformation could be due to the high turnover of breast epithelial tissue during breastfeeding. While the reasons are still unclear, their data add to the field’s previous understandings.

    Other aspects of their findings have validated some early discoveries about important immune cells in breast milk. “We found a type of macrophage in human breast milk that other researchers have identified before in mouse breast tissue,” says Nyquist. “We were really excited that our results confirmed similar things they were seeing.”

    Applying her research to Covid-19

    In addition to studying cells in breast milk, Nyquist has applied her skills to studying organ cells that can be infected by Covid-19. The study began early into the pandemic, when Nyquist and her lab mates realized they could explore their lab’s collective cellular data in a new way. “We began looking to see if there were any cells that expressed genes that can be hijacked for cellular entry by the Covid-19 virus,” she says. “Sure enough, we found there are cells in nasal, lung, and gut tissues that are more susceptible to mediating viral entry.”

    Their results were published and communicated to the public at a rapid speed. To Nyquist, this was evidence for how collaboration and computational tools are essential at producing next generation biological research. “I had never been on a project this fast-moving before — we were able to produce figures in just two weeks. I think it was encouraging to the public to see that scientists are working on this so quickly,” she says.

    Outside of her own research, Nyquist enjoys mentoring and teaching other scientists. One of her favorite experiences was teaching coding at HSSP, a multiweekend program for middle and high schoolers, run by MIT students. The experience encouraged her to think of ways to make coding approachable to students of any background. “It can be challenging to figure out whether to message it as easy or hard, because either can scare people away. I try to get people excited enough to where they can learn the basics and build confidence to dive in further,” she says.

    After graduation, Nyquist hopes to continue her love for mentoring by pursuing a career as a professor. She plans on deepening her research into uterine health, potentially by studying how different infectious diseases affect female reproductive tissues. Her goal is to provide greater insight about biological processes that have long been considered taboo.

    “It’s crazy to me that we have so much more to learn about important topics like periods, breastfeeding, or menopause,” says Nyquist. “For example, we don’t understand how some medications impact people differently during pregnancy. Some doctors tell pregnant people to go off their antidepressants, because they worry it might affect their baby. In reality, there’s so much we don’t actually know.”   

    “When I tell people that this is my career direction, they often say that it’s hard to get funding for female reproductive health research, since it only affects 50 percent of the population,” she says.

    “I think I can convince them to change their minds.” More

  • in

    Biden and Putin spar over cybersecurity, ransomware at Geneva summit

    Ransomware was a major point of discussion for both US President Joe Biden and Russian President Vladimir Putin during their first in-person summit on Wednesday. After the three-hour meeting in Geneva, Switzerland, both leaders held separate press conferences where they hinted at key points of discussions and potential compromise.Putin denied that Russia was harboring ransomware groups and refused to answer questions about other cyberattacks. Biden was also vague about what was agreed upon between the two leaders but confirmed that he pressed Putin specifically on the issue of ransomware. “I talked about the proposition that certain critical infrastructure should be off limits to attack. Period. By cyber or any other means. I gave them a list, 16 specific entities. 16 defined as critical infrastructure,” Biden said.Tom Kellermann, a member of the US Secret Service’s Cyber Investigations Advisory Board, said the 16 entities Biden was referring to were what CISA has defined as “critical infrastructure sectors.”Kellermann added that the 16 sectors are chemical, commercial facilities, communications, critical manufacturing, dams, defense industrial base, emergency, energy, financial services, food and agriculture, government facilities, healthcare and public health, information technology, nuclear reactors, materials and waste, transportation systems, water and waste systems.  All of these sectors have faced dozens of ransomware attacks over the last three years, and Biden said he pushed Putin to understand what the US was going through. He referenced the ransomware attack on Colonial Pipeline, which left parts of the East Coast scrambling for gas for days. “I looked at him and said: ‘How would you feel if ransomware took on the pipelines from your oil fields?’ He said: ‘It would matter.’ I pointed out to him that we have significant cyber capability. And he knows it,” Biden said to reporters. 

    He went on to say that there were “reputational” consequences to the cyberattacks being leveraged from Russia that Putin was aware of.The meeting follows a stern warning that was sent out by the US and other G7 countries on Monday that specifically called out Russia for either launching their own cyberattacks or harboring ransomware organizations. The G7 said Russia needed to “identify, disrupt, and hold to account those within its borders who conduct ransomware attacks, abuse virtual currency to launder ransoms, and other cyber crimes.”NATO also sent out a statement after the summit in Brussels reaffirming the idea that “the impact of significant malicious cumulative cyber activities might, in certain circumstances, be considered as amounting to an armed attack.”Kellermann, who is also head of cybersecurity strategy at VMware, said the summit was “a seminal moment for civilizing cyberspace” and praised Biden for highlighting the need to protect critical industries.”As a result of this delineation, I believe that significant ransomware attacks against major critical infrastructures will diminish now, but possibly increase against traditional corporations, such as in the retail and financial sectors.”Many cybersecurity experts said the summit would have little effect on ransomware groups allowed to operate with impunity in a number of countries. But the idea that cybersecurity had reached a level of concern worthy of mention among two world leaders was a positive sign for some.”It was an excellent use of the ‘bully pulpit’ to let the world know that cybersecurity matters to America — and specifically the office of the president. We in the cybersecurity world already have an ‘all-hands-on-deck’ mentality — but it’s healthy to see that our concern is now shared in the prism of leadership, outside of our sector,” said YouAttest CEO Garret Grajek. Elena Elkina, a partner at privacy and data protection consulting firm Aleada, noted that Putin does not like demands or being told what to do, and she predicted he would respond to Biden’s forceful talk about cyberattacks in a more understated way. “It will be something more tangible that makes obvious his opinion,” she said. Cybersecurity researcher Chloé Messdaghi said the summit was just one manifestation of a deeper cyber Cold War that both countries needed to back down from. While the summit was a good start to addressing the problems between both countries, Messdaghi said formalized pacts around cybersecurity would be hard to come by. “The reality is that we may never have absolute and effective treaty-level accords on cyberattacks because so much is done by proxy, but each global superpower must strive to prevent chaos within their borders,” Messdaghi added. More

  • in

    14 COVIDSafe enquiries to OAIC, but still no complaints or breaches

    The Office of the Australian Information Commissioner (OAIC) has released its second six-monthly report on the privacy and security of Australia’s controversial COVIDSafe app.While there were no reports of breaches, no complaints made, and no investigations underway, the OAIC said the app, paraded by Prime Minister Scott Morrison as “digital sunscreen”, was the subject of 14 “enquiries”.This comprised 12 enquiries from individuals and two from businesses during the period 16 November 2020 to 15 May 2021.”We provided general information in response to 11 enquiries and provided assistance on how to make a complaint in response to three enquiries,” the report [PDF] said.During Senate Estimates last month, Information and Privacy Commissioner Angelene Falk said the OAIC, by the end of April, received around 25 inquiries from members of the public seeking information about COVIDsafe and their privacy rights. Breaking down the types of enquiries, the report said the OAIC received 10 enquiries raising general issues or concerns about COVIDSafe, including an enquiry about the changes to the Privacy Act relating to COVIDSafe and an enquiry from an individual seeking to delete data uploaded to the National COVIDSafe Data Store. The OAIC also received four enquiries about a request to download or use COVIDSafe, which the report explained as an enquiry about a venue refusing an individual entry unless they used COVIDSafe or signed in using a QR code and an enquiry about whether an employer could require an employee to download COVIDSafe.

    The legislation wrapped around COVIDSafe prevents a directive from an employer or venue to require the app’s download.Falk told Senators last month the OAIC has implemented a series of assessments or audits of the COVIDSafe app, which she said assess the privacy safeguards in relation to the Privacy Act and follow the “information lifecycle” of the COVIDsafe app.”We’re assessing the security and access protections to the national COVIDSafe’s data storage facility,” she said. “We’re also assessing the manner in which information is accessed by the states and territories. And the legislation passed by Parliament at this time last year, gave my office jurisdiction in relation to the states and territories handling of that COVIDSafe app data.”The OAIC has four assessments underway. The report said the OAIC has progressed draft reports for all of them.The agency also provided guidance for state and territory health authorities regarding COVIDSafe and COVID app data during the reported period.Also included in the OAIC document is a report from the Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security (IGIS).IGIS reviewed the compliance of agencies it has oversight of between 16 November 2020 and 15 May 2021 and said it remained satisfied that these agencies have appropriate policies and/or procedures in place and are taking reasonable steps to avoid the intentional collection of COVID app data.”IGIS staff have conducted inspections of these agencies to determine whether COVID app data that has been collected incidentally as part of agency functions has not been accessed or used, and that any COVID app data has been deleted as soon as practicable after the agency becomes aware it has been collected,” IGIS wrote in its brief report.”While relevant agencies have incidentally collected COVID app data, which the Privacy Act recognises may occur, IGIS had found that there is no evidence to suggest that these agencies have deliberately targeted or have decrypted, accessed, or used such data.”IGIS has not received any complaints or public interest disclosures about COVIDSafe app data, but said there were ongoing discussions between relevant parties regarding the application of the prohibition against “disclosure” as set out in the Privacy Act.COVIDSafe, according to the Digital Transformation Agency, had picked up 567 close contacts not found through my manual contact tracing, a large increase on the previous number of 17 contacts. The agency said there have been 779 uploads to the National Data Store since inception last year.Earlier this week, the government of Western Australia introduced legislation that would keep the information obtained via the SafeWA check-in app by contact tracers away from the state’s law enforcement authorities.The state currently lacks protections for such information, with WA Police having used it to investigate “two serious crimes”.”The system was introduced in the middle of the global pandemic and while access to this information was lawful, the WA government’s intention was for contact registers to only be used for contact tracing purposes,” the government said.”Information collected through the SafeWA app has never been able to be used for commercial purposes. This will remain the case under the new legislation.”The ABC on Wednesday reported the state government was forced to introduce legislation after failing to reach an agreement with police. The report indicates Premier Mark McGowan found out in April that police were accessing the data to find witnesses to a number of serious crimes, including a murder, but was previously unaware.”We attempted to negotiate an agreement with the police. They advised that it was lawful, and they couldn’t not do things that are lawful,” he told ABC Radio Perth.WA Police Commissioner Chris Dawson said the circumstances that required access to the SafeWA data were exceptional.”I accept that people don’t always read fine print on insurance policies or whatever, and this is a very important principle, but the police have only got information twice out of 240 million transactions and they were exceptional circumstances, and it is lawful,” he said, speaking on 6PR radio.”Police have a duty to investigate crime, and we’re talking about a man who was shot in a public arena with an allegedly high-powered weapon, and other people were injured.”The state opposition has called it “a breach of trust”.RELATED COVERAGE More

  • in

    Tim Cook claims sideloading apps would destroy security and privacy of iOS

    Image: Apple
    Tim Cook has claimed in an interview with Brut that if Apple was forced to allow sideloading of apps, as Android does, it would destroy security and privacy of iOS. Speaking to the Digital Markets Act proposed by the European Commission, Cook said sideloading was not in the “best interests of the user”. “That would destroy the security of the iPhone and a lot of the privacy initiatives that we’ve built into the App Store where we have privacy nutrition labels and app tracking transparency, where it forces people to get permission to track across apps,” Cook said. “These things would would not exist anymore except in people that stuck in our ecosystem and so I worry deeply about privacy and security.” The Apple CEO said Android has 47 times more malware than iOS, and this was directly due to Apple’s ecosystem being tied down to one app store and all apps being reviewed. “That keeps a lot of this malware stuff out of our ecosystem, and customers have told us very continuously how much they value that, and so we’re going to be standing up for the user in in the discussions and we’ll see where it goes,” he said. Cook did say there were parts of the Digital Services Act (DSA) that could be used to fight online disinformation.

    “We do suffer today from vast disinformation … it’s clear that there needs to be something done here,” he said. “This is not an acceptable state of the world and as I look at the DSA, there’s some parts of it that I think will help this, but I’m not sure that anybody yet has a handle on how to fix it entirely and I think it deserves more discussion and more debate.” In recent testimony as part of the Epic vs Apple trial, Cook said without curation, Apple’s App Store would be a toxic mess. Related Coverage More

  • in

    Macquarie Uni researchers find an oversharing of personal data in health apps

    Image: Getty Images
    Researchers from Macquarie University have found what they labelled as serious problems with privacy and inconsistent privacy practices in health apps.The researchers estimated that just over 99,000 apps out of the 2.8 million on Google Play and 1.96 million on the Apple App Store relate to health and fitness. They include the management of health conditions and symptom checking, as well as step and calorie counters and menstruation trackers.They probed 15,000 free health apps in the Google Play store and compared their privacy practices with a random sample of more than 8,000 non-health apps. They found that while these apps collected less user data than other types of mobile apps, 88% could access and potentially share personal data.”For example, about two thirds could collect advert identifiers or cookies, one third could collect a user’s email address, and about a quarter could identify the mobile phone tower to which a user’s device is connected, potentially providing information on the user’s geolocation,” the researchers wrote in a study published by The BMJ.See also: Fertility-tracking app Flo Health settles FTC allegations of inappropriate data sharingOnly 4% of the health-related apps actually transmitted data, which was mostly user’s name and location information. “This percentage is substantial and should be taken as a lower bound for the real data transmissions performed by the apps,” they added.

    The analysis of app files and code identified 65,068 data collection operations; on average four for each app. Analysis of app traffic identified 3,148 transmissions of user data across 616 different apps. The main types of data collected by these apps include contact information, user location, and several device identifiers such as IMEI, MAC address, and IMSI, which is an international mobile subscriber identity.Privacy analysis of mobile health apps
    Image: Macquarie University
    87.5% of data collection operations and 56% of user data transmissions were on behalf of third-party services, such as external advertisers, analytics, and tracking providers, the research found. 23% of user data transmissions occurred on insecure communication channels, they added.665 unique third party entities were identified but those responsible for most of the data collection operations, the researchers said, were the likes of Google, Facebook, and Yahoo!.”The apps collected user data on behalf of hundreds of third parties, with a small number of service providers accounting for most of the collected data,” the research says.The researchers also found that 28% — 5,903 — of the apps it analysed did not offer any privacy policy text, and at least 25% — 15,480 — of user data transmissions violated what was stated in the privacy policies. “Mobile apps are fast becoming sources of information and decision support tools for both clinicians and patients,” the researchers concluded. “Such privacy risks should be articulated to patients and could be made part of app usage consent. “We believe the trade-off between the benefits and risks of ‘mHealth’ apps should be considered for any technical and policy discussion surrounding the services provided by such apps.”RELATED COVERAGEApple’s new privacy tool lets you choose which apps can see and share your data. Here’s what you need to knowThe Cupertino giant has announced a new privacy feature coming next spring, which will let users make their own data choices.Google says iOS privacy summaries will arrive when its apps are updatedSearch and advertising giant says it is working to ‘understand and comply’ with Apple’s upcoming changes to app tracking.These dating apps are tracking your locationWhile dating apps are a simple click away on the app stores, as soon as you download them, they become a treasure trove of personal information that can be used against you.Contact-tracing apps: Android phones were leaking sensitive data, find researchersAndroid phones have been keeping track of contact-tracing apps’ data in system logs, which some third-party apps can easily access. More

  • in

    Ukrainian police partner with US, South Korea for raid on Clop ransomware members

    The Ukrainian National Police announced a series of raids on Wednesday that ended with the arrest of six people allegedly part of the group behind the Clop ransomware. The group is responsible for some of the most headline-grabbing ransomware attacks seen over the last two years, with hundreds of victims ranging from Shell and Kroger to Stanford University, the University of Maryland, and the University of Colorado. Ukrainian police said the total damage done by their attacks amounts to an estimated $500 million.The Cyberpolice Department of the Ukrainian National Police released a lengthy report Wednesday morning on the raids that included photos and video. Working with South Korean police officers, members of Interpol and unnamed US agencies, officers in Ukraine raided 21 different residences in Kyiv and nearby towns.During the raid, dozens of computers and expensive cars were seized in addition to about $185,000. The report said server infrastructure was taken down and the homes were seized. The six people arrested are facing up to eight years in prison for a variety of crimes related to the group’s ransomware attacks and the laundering of money brought in from ransoms. 
    Ukranian National Police
    The Ukranian National Police noted that South Korean officials were particularly interested in the raid because of ransomware attacks launched by Clop against four South Korean companies in 2019. More than 800 internal servers and computers from the companies were infected in the attacks.The group also attacked South Korean e-commerce giant E-Land in November, crippling the company for days. Clop members became well-known for attacking companies using old versions of the Accellion FTA file-sharing server like Bombardier. The Reserve Bank of New Zealand, Washington State Auditor, and cybersecurity firm Qualys are just a few of the victims attacked by Clop members through the Accellion vulnerability.

    Kim Bromley, senior cyber threat intelligence analyst at Digital Shadows, said the Clop ransomware has been active since February 2019 and generally targets large organizations. “Despite partaking in the ever-popular double-extortion tactic, Clop’s reported activity level is relatively low when compared with the likes of ‘REvil’ (aka Sodinokibi) or ‘Conti,'” Bromley explained.In spite of the press around the raid, many online noted that the leak site used by Clop members is still up. A source from cybersecurity company Intel 471 threw cold water on the excitement around the raid in an interview with Bleeping Computer. They told the news outlet that they do not think any of the major players behind Clop were arrested in the raid because they live in Russia. They added that the people arrested were mostly involved in the money laundering part of the ransomware operation.  Clop rose to prominence in 2020 after they demanded a ransom of more than $20 million from Software AG, one of the largest software companies in the world. Multiple cybersecurity companies have reported that Clop has ties to a malware distribution group named TA505 and a cybercrime group known as FIN11.Ransomware groups are facing increased scrutiny from law enforcement globally as hundreds of organizations continue to deal with the crippling aftereffects of attacks. Bromley noted that last week, the Avaddon ransomware shut down its operations and the Ziggy ransomware did the same earlier this year, signaling that the increasing law enforcement pressure was having an effect. “Arrests and operations targeting ransomware infrastructure must continue in the short term, in order to maintain pressure on ransomware operators,” Bromley added.  Vectra CTO Oliver Tavakoli, said raids like this are one of the key levers that can be used to shrink the lucrative ransomware ecosystem. “When the likelihood of repercussions rise, less people will be drawn into the business of ransomware,” Tavakoli said. “When periodic disruptions occur in the supply chain of ransomware and sometimes ransoms are reclaimed (as the FBI recently did with some of the Colonial Pipeline ransom payments), the business of ransomware itself becomes less lucrative and less people are drawn into it.”Other experts noted the timing of the raid, which came on the same day as the summit between US President Joe Biden and Russian President Vladimir Putin. Ransomware was a significant topic of discussion, Biden said after the meeting. “This is a bold move, especially given Ukraine’s tensions with Russia. It would be better to see comprehensive global law enforcement efforts take hold,” said Hitesh Sheth, CEO at Vectra. “Cybersecurity has displaced nuclear arms as the premier superpower security issue of our era. We can hope the Biden-Putin summit leads to cooperation and structural progress in this area.” More