More stories

  • in

    Barracuda Networks changes hands with purchase by global investment firm KKR

    Barracuda Networks has been acquired by KKR, an investment outfit taking the company over from past owner Thoma Bravo.

    Founded in 2003, Barracuda is the developer of cybersecurity solutions, including email protection, app and cloud defenses, data management, and network security. Products include Secure Access Service Edge (SASE) offerings, threat detection and response, and data inspection.The company caters to approximately 200,000 customers worldwide and focuses on small to medium-sized businesses. It appears that the cybersecurity firm recently captured the interest of KKR, an investment company that markets itself as offering “alternative asset management.” The funds managed by KKR include hedge funds, private equity, credit, and real-world assets. The acquisition was announced on April 12. Private equity firm Thoma Bravo purchased Barracuda in 2017 for $1.6 billion. At the time, the sale was intended to increase Barracuda’s growth and maximize shareholder value. Four years after being listed on the NYSE, Barracuda (CUDA) then went private. The financial terms of the deal have not been disclosed. However, the companies say that since Thoma Bravo’s acquisition, Barracuda has enjoyed growth at “over $500 million” in revenue. Reuters reports that the acquisition is worth approximately $4 billion, including debt. KKR says that Barracuda’s growth is still a priority and the investment outfit will support its expansion in areas including detection and response and SASE. “We continue to see cybersecurity as a highly attractive sector and are excited to back a clear leader in the space,” commented John Park, Head of Americas Technology Private Equity at KKR. “Given its proven track record of growth and innovation, we believe that Barracuda has the right team and model to capture business in this growing market.” The transaction is expected to close by the end of 2022, subject to customary conditions.  Previous and related coverage Have a tip? Get in touch securely via WhatsApp | Signal at +447713 025 499, or over at Keybase: charlie0 More

  • in

    Hacking forum RaidForums shut down and founder arrested in global police operation

    Image: Getty Images
    The RaidForums hacker forum, used by cybercriminals to primarily buy and sell stolen databases, has been shut down and its domains seized by US law enforcement as part of an operation coordinated by Europol that involved law enforcement agencies across numerous countries. “The takedown of this online market for the resale of hacked or stolen data disrupts one of the major ways cybercriminals profit from the large-scale theft of sensitive personal and financial information,” US Justice Department (DOJ) assistant attorney-general Kenneth Polite Jr said in a statement. Prior to the forum’s seizure, hundreds of databases of stolen data containing more than 10 billion unique records for individuals had been offered for sale, the DOJ said. The global enforcement action, labelled as Operation Tourniquet, saw Europol, the UK National Crime Agency (NCA), US Justice Department, along with Portuguese, Swedish, and Romanian law enforcement officials work together to close the RaidForums hacker forum. The various countries worked together on this operation for at least a year through Europol’s Joint Cybercrime Action Taskforce, where officials exchanged information with each other to enable investigators to define the different roles played by the individuals who ran the marketplace, Europol said. US charges have also been laid against RaidForums’ Portuguese founder and chief administrator, Diogo Santos Coelho, who was arrested in the UK in January. Coelho has been accused of running the forum, which entailed establishing a membership scheme where users of the site could pay for access to chatrooms that allowed the exchange of links, photographs, and data linked to cyber-crime.Among the charges are conspiracy, access device fraud, and aggravated identify theft in connection with his role as the chief administrator of RaidForums. Coelho is currently in UK custody and could be extradited to the US pending legal proceedings to face these charges. Two of Coelho’s accomplices have also been arrested. One of them, a 21-year-old UK citizen, was arrested by the NCA in March but has since been released under investigation. At the time of this unnamed individual’s arrest, police officers seized £5,000 in cash, thousands in US dollars, and put a freeze on crypto assets worth more than half a million dollars. Related Coverage More

  • in

    The high price of free Wi-Fi: Here's why you never connect to an insecure network

    Later that day odd things begin to happen. Your phone isn’t working exactly as expected and you start receiving a deluge of what appears like harmless spam.
    Getty Images
    Let me set the scene for you: You’re on the go and you need to stop and get a coffee. You enter the coffee shop and the aroma is the first thing to entice you. Next, you see all the lovely people sitting around making deals, writing the great American novel, chatting, and just generally enjoying themselves. You then notice a sign that states, “Free Wi-Fi.” Score!

    ZDNet Recommends

    You pull out your phone, open the network connection app and notice the wireless connection doesn’t have a password.Even better.You connect to the wireless network and order your quad long shot grande in a venti cup half caff double cupped no sleeve salted caramel mocha latte with 2 pumps of vanilla substitute 2 pumps of white chocolate mocha for mocha and substitute 2 pumps of hazelnut for toffee nut half whole milk and half breve with no whipped cream extra hot extra foam extra caramel drizzle extra salt add a scoop of vanilla bean powder with light ice well stirred.While the barista brews your ridiculously complicated order, you sit down and start using all that free Wi-Fi. You send email, you communicate to team members on Slack, send SMS messages to friends and family, check-in on Facebook, and tweet the single most profound statement Twitter has ever beheld.Life is good.You get your drink and continue on as though nothing can touch you.Eventually, you leave and think nothing of your experience (other than how delicious the coffee was and how on point your Twitter game is). Later that day (or maybe the next day) odd things begin to happen. Your phone isn’t working exactly as expected and you start receiving a deluge of what appears like harmless spam.Okay, fine…all in a day’s existence, right? But then you get a warning from your bank.And you start seeing reactions to things you didn’t post or send.You check in on your bank account to find your balance is at zero.Panic sets in.What happened? You’ve always been so careful with your bank account credentials and you never share that kind of information with anyone.This can’t be real, can it?

    It can and it most likely all started with you connecting to a simple password-less wireless network.The truth is, you are not safe. Your information isn’t safe, your identity isn’t safe, your mobile devices aren’t safe. Because of this, you have to take every precaution you can, which means never (ever, ever) connecting to an insecure network.Why are insecure networks so bad?The simple truth is when you connect to insecure Wi-Fi, you open your device to anyone who is also connected to that same wireless network. But why is that so bad? So what if other people can see my device on the network?Let me put this in simplest terms.Not every application you use on your mobile device encrypts your data. That means you could be submitting usernames, passwords, and even text messages in plain text. What does that mean? Simple: When you use an app that works with encryption, any data you send or receive is encrypted in such a way that it’s very difficult to read. So instead of sending the plain text “password” (which you should never use), it’ll send something like this instead:hQGMA0mnhEQQ+utUAQwAixnPWw4LcXk1Njq0zHc8RRYnlN1424RASIT+s0d9DAHe
    wIwzrLemIKo0Z97aZ97g0FdmlbWbPELt4Er7O0L/4ERvaWRhW3hf7WsipX0/PAVD
    Kz99IN/TT6srb6T08f6wpVCn4kuKl60Dl2630QvFxe4HtmbgzqnzqdUZ53sFknX4
    TlRJw8K8lZ+/o5nW88JG+3MfKq/gd5eHIxDWLUZg5MDORhPy6FckeuF4ejWjKfzM
    WCkNP+IEq7trZ6/SH724HES8nHxIiaH9CaI1D7cHckR0cvF40Xo+rCIP9Qu6Ahax
    yOHqKmDhjfjV11H4MVZrhjn2zFI5jBahmUvZc0+JvtHuI/Bd26buo50Xg3co01em
    kog0P9GK/4TNMtIuxupiSMryNM0l18FjWzso6ojf662nF4nDpiUQmJVCcpRhSNHO
    twXM1tvmNSjN0OTf6hiU3tD4iE1N5FhTSkeq7Rz9DunraO7aILNArpt8ndbOssV5
    gt5eWnsGMUR/7EK6htvA0kQBgHjl0o98rjTcvTF+pZtQSr3omSQTiafRXDxHBbT7
    xbMWyNxWQ91PEDWuTtaMbqlDkxbUmqlFFJ6XgvyzqjsRqaTuCQ==
    =psm9
    That, my friends, is encryption. And unless your applications are all using it, you’re sending plain text over a network that anyone can access. Once connected, a bad actor could use a sniffer to intercept your plain-text data packets and read them. And the tools used to capture those packages are readily available to anyone.You might think this is just a warning that can be ignored at will. To that point, you would be right. This is a warning but it’s one you should heed. When you connect to insecure wireless networks, it’s only a matter of time before someone intercepts your data and you fall prey to any number of nefarious doings. 

    ZDNet Recommends

    The best mobile VPNs

    Here’s how to find an effective Virtual Private Network service for both iOS-powered iPhones and Android smartphones.

    Read More

    Here are the reasons why you should never connect to an insecure wireless network:Anyone with the knowledge can steal your data.That’s really the only bullet point you need. And although I’d like to sugar-coat this for you, the truth of the matter is the longer you ignore this advice, the more at risk you are. What can you do?You might find yourself in a situation where you absolutely must connect to an insecure wireless network (maybe you’re out of data and have work to do). When you find yourself in such a situation, consider the possible options:Never send any passwords or sensitive information when connected to that insecure wireless network.Use a VPN (such as Tunnelbear) when connected to those insecure networks (as it will encrypt and anonymize your data).Use a more secure web browser (such as Brave or Firefox), so you can enable features like always use HTTPS and secure DNS.Enable secure DNS in your web browser of choice (so all of your searches are encrypted).Enable end-2-end encryption in the Android Messenger app (Settings > Chat features > Enable chat features) so all of your SMS messages are encrypted.

    Disable sharing features as needed (so you’re not opening your device up for even more unwanted connections from bad actors).Invest in an unlimited data plan for your phone, so you never have to bother with connecting to an insecure network.Let’s break the above done. The absolute best path you can take is to invest in an unlimited data plan. Why? With an unlimited plan, you will never have a need to connect to an insecure wireless network (especially given how fast 5G speeds are). If, however, that’s not an option, I would highly suggest, at a minimum, you use a VPN every time you connect to an insecure network, work with a more secure browser and enable end-2-end encryption on your SMS apps. As you can see, other than only using your data plan, there’s no 1-step solution for this problem. And even when using your carrier data, you could up your security game by following the above advice.The same thing holds true when using a laptop and is especially true when using a Windows-based laptop. If the location you’re working in only offers an insecure network, your best bet is to tether your laptop to your mobile device and use the phone’s data plan for connectivity.I know the inclination is to roll your eyes at such warnings, but this is one you should take seriously. Do not connect to insecure wireless networks. Period. End. Of. Story. If you value your privacy and the security of your data, you will follow this advice to the letter. More

  • in

    DuckDuckGo brings is privacy-focused browser to Macs

    An example of DuckDuckGo for Mac’s tracker blocker in action
    Duck Duck Go
    DuckDuckGo, best known for its privacy-focused search engine, is bringing its equally privacy-focused web browser to desktops for the first time, starting with Macs. 

    The company teased its desktop browser plans late last year, but this is the first time the company’s been able to get its hands on any version of the promised software. Like the company’s iOS and Android browsers, DuckDuckGo for Mac was built, from the ground up, to prioritize the user’s privacy at all times. This added security is powered by features like built-in access to the private DuckDuckGo search engine, pop-up cookie protection, a one-click option for clearing all browsing data, email protection, and automatically defaulting to the encrypted (HTTPS) version of all sites, and more. The new browser apparently uses macOS’ built-in website rendering engine (the same one used by Safari, DuckDuckGo noted) to provide fast load times. The company claims that these expedited loads are made even quicker by its default blocking of all ad trackers. Also: 5 best browsers for privacy: Secure web browsingDuckDuckGo for Mac is launching as a private beta, with its maker noting that some features are not yet fully implemented. Among those missing features is support for extensions. While it does plan to enable extensions at a later date, DuckDuckGo claims that the browser’s built-in password manager and ad-blocker already do the job of the two most commonly downloaded extension types without the need to install third-party solutions.It also noted that the built-in password manager is able to import your saved credentials from third-party extensions like 1Password or LastPass to make your transition easier. Also: Best password manager: Maintain all your loginsUsers interested in joining the waitlist to test out the private beta can do so by downloading one of the company’s mobile browser apps, going to its Settings menu, and tapping on DuckDuckGo for Desktop (in the “More from DuckDuckGo” section). There you’ll see an option to “Join the Private Waitlist.” Once you’re granted access, a notification from the mobile app will provide an invite code that can be used to download DuckDuckGo for Mac on your system of choice. The company noted that it is already working on a version of its browser for Windows-based PCs. However, it did not provide a timeframe for when that edition might be available.  More

  • in

    Microsoft's April 2022 Patch Tuesday tackles two zero-day vulnerabilities

    Microsoft has released over 100 security fixes for software that resolve critical issues including two zero-days. In the Redmond giant’s latest round of patches, usually released on the second Tuesday of each month in what is known as Patch Tuesday, Microsoft has fixed problems including numerous remote code execution (RCE) bugs, elevation of privilege (EoP) issues, denial-of-service, information leaks, and spoofing. In total, 10 vulnerabilities are classed as critical. Products impacted by April’s security update include the Windows OS, Microsoft Office, Dynamics, Edge, Hyper-V, File Server, Skype for Business, and Windows SMB.  Read on: The zero-day vulnerabilities resolved in this update are: CVE-2022-26904: This known zero-day flaw impacts the Windows User Profile Service and is described as an EoP vulnerability. The bug has been issued a CVSS severity score of 7.0 and its attack complexity is considered ‘high’, as “successful exploitation of this vulnerability requires an attacker to win a race condition,” according to Microsoft.CVE-2022-24521: This bug is another EoP issue found in the Windows Common Log File System Driver. Issued a CVSS score of 7.8, Microsoft says that attack complexity is low and the company has detected active exploitation, despite the flaw not being made public until now. Two other security issues, CVE-2022-26809 and CVE-2022-24491, are also of note. These vulnerabilities, impacting Remote Procedure Call Runtime and the Windows Network File System, have earned CVSS scores of 9.8 and can be exploited to trigger RCE.According to the Zero Day Initiative (ZDI), the patch volume level is similar to Q1 2021.Last month, Microsoft resolved 71 vulnerabilities in the March batch of security fixes. Among the bugs dealt with are CVE-2022-22006 and CVE-2022-24501, which are the only two critical bugs that were patched. In February, Microsoft patched 48 vulnerabilities, including one zero-day security flaw.In other Microsoft news, the tech giant is planning a change that could mean an end to Patch Tuesday as we know it. Dubbed Windows Autopatch, the automatic Windows and Office software update service will be rolled out to enterprise clients to make sure they have access to security fixes more quickly, rather than waiting for one monthly update — with the exception of emergency out-of-schedule releases. Windows Autopatch is set for release in July 2022. Read on: Microsoft: Windows Autopatch is coming soon. Here’s what you need to knowAlongside Microsoft’s Patch Tuesday round, other vendors, too, have published security updates which can be accessed below. More

  • in

    Best internet speed test (2022)

    Working from home has become a new norm for many. Enterprises are now embarking on hybrid working arrangements and that means home internet connections remain critical for people who need to hop on a or Zoom video call while the kids are attending virtual classes, playing , or watching . Home broadband connections were put to the test during the initial COVID-19 phase of pandemic lockdowns around the globe as employees logged in, en masse, from managed and BYOD devices to their needed business applications, Microsoft 365, and Google Workspace over VPNs. Also: Internet slow? Here are 7 possible reasons why and how to fix themHere are five broadband speed tests that ZDNet considers trustworthy. To get a true picture of your broadband speed, you’ll likely need to run the tests multiple times and check results across different devices throughout the day. It may also be worth running these tests on multiple devices on your home network. If one device produces a vastly slowly or faster result, you may be dealing with a problem at the LAN or Wi-Fi level, rather than with your broadband provider’s network. 

    Ookla’s Speedtest

    Best internet speed test

    Speedtest from Ookla, which also owns outage site, Downdetector, was one of the first broadband speed tests and offers a snapshot of download and upload speeds to an ISP via its website or a lightweight app for Windows 10 or macOS. It’s also available in 17 languages, and if you set up an account, you can keep track of your speeds over time. The service displays the current download and upload speeds and measurements for ‘ping’, ‘jitter’, and packet loss. There are also options to change the local server that the ISP speed test is conducted with — a configuration option that most other tests lack. Plus, results can be shared on social media.   Ookla has some helpful explanatory notes for people who aren’t familiar with the ping test. It’s a latency test. Ookla says that less than 59 milliseconds (MS) ping is very good for online games. The FCC wants satellite broadband providers to deliver latency of below 100 ms to bid for a slice of its Rural Digital Opportunity Fund (RDOF). SpaceX says its Starlink satellites will provide a latency of 20ms to 40ms.   Its website is useful for those who are curious enough to learn why a test on a mobile device returns a different result to a laptop or a device that’s physically connected to a router.  Each test taken with Speedtest uses Ookla’s server network of over 14,000 servers and reports back on key network health metrics, Nick Turner, a technical trainer at Ookla, tells ZDNet. “There are Speedtest servers in virtually every country and major population center worldwide,” Turner said.  He argues that Ookla’s distributed server network makes it more accurate than many other tests. “This enables us to more easily select ‘nearby’ servers or combinations of servers that are capable of delivering the sufficient bandwidth necessary to discover the most accurate maximum speeds to the device in question. Since our founding in 2006, an unparalleled total of more than 35 billion tests have been taken with Speedtest.”Pros:   It’s a general purpose broadband speed test in use since 2006   It’s not from an ISP or a service provider    Users can select the host server from which to test their ISP’s speed test Cons:   The site uses tech-lingo that some people might not understand    It’s full of ads and ad trackers 

    Netflix’s Fast.com

    Best for Netflix

    Like other entries on this list, Netflix’s Fast.com broadband speed is run by a company that has an interest in its customers having a fast enough connection to stream its content. That means there are none of the lingering questions about potential bias from speed tests run by ISPs. Plus, the tests are international, using servers where Netflix has installed appliances for its giant content delivery network (CDN).  Netflix has a vast CDN called Netflix Open Connect, which relies on Open Connect appliances installed within ISPs that peer with Netflix. That CDN is built around the principle of moving content closer to users and is how it delivers a fast streaming experience. Hence, the Fast.com test is designed to test the connection between a person’s device and Netflix’s CDN servers. That means the results are specific to Netflix’s own network, which makes sense for the company but also means it looks at speeds from a particular perspective.   The Fast.com website keeps things simple by only showing the download speed. In my tests, it reported slower speeds than Oookla’s Speedtest. And it produced wildly different results between wifi tests on a 2017 macOS MacBook Pro (160Mbps) and an iPhone 12 (330 Mbps), with both on a modern router’s 5GHz frequency.But on Fast.com, you don’t even need to click ‘Go’; just opening the site in a browser tab starts the test. There’s also a “Show more” option, which provides latency speeds and upload speeds, as well as where the servers used in the test are located.  Pros:   It’s designed to test the speed of your connection to Netflix’s servers   There are no ads    It’s relevant to your connection wherever you’re streaming Netflix from Cons:   It’s not really designed to test your ISP’s connection speed    Results are specific to Netflix infrastructure    Only provides download speeds

    The Google speed test for Stadia online gaming

    Best for a specific web application

    The Google Stadia online gaming platform has hit a few bumps since launching in 2019, but it is a massive platform, and the company knows that consumer broadband speeds are critical for adoption.Google recommends a download speed of no less than 10 Mbps to stream games on Stadia but recommends faster speeds for displays with a resolution higher than 720p HD. It teamed up with open source project Measurement Lab or M-Lab to run its speed test. The project is led by teams at Code for Science & Society and Google. The Google Stadia web interface is pretty simple — literally a one-click task at Google’s Projectstream website from the “Check Now” button. It’s focused on Stadia users, and so, for accuracy, it recommends people use the device and network where they want to play and have a strong wi-fi or Ethernet connection. It also recommends halting current downloads and file-sharing and closing tabs that are streaming video. The measurement takes less than 30 seconds to complete and returns similar results to Ookla. At the least, it confirms whether you’ll have a decent experience when gaming on Stadia.However, as Google notes, the test only provides a general indication of the quality of a connection and does not guarantee Stadia will work. Other factors include the device, ISP, and other activities that are consuming bandwidth.Pros:   It’s a general purpose broadband speed test based on a platform in use since 2006   It’s not from an ISP or a service provider    Users can select the host server from which to test their ISP’s speed test Cons:   It’s primarily focused on Stadia, despite offering useful measurements for all 

    Comcast’s Xfinity xFi speed test

    Can you trust your ISP’s speed test?

    As a top US contender in the gigabit internet market, Comcast’s Xfinity xFi broadband speed test is a popular choice for Americans. The speed test itself operates similarly to Google’s speed test, but the site has some pointers for customers wanting to explore why the speed results might not match the user’s plan. These are helpful, but I feel defensive as if they were written to help reduce customer support calls for why a broadband isn’t as fast as advertised.    On the other hand, it provides more context about factors that can affect the home connection, such as an old home gateway lowering available bandwidth. The result also explains what the device being tested can do, such as streaming 4K video. The site prioritizes download speeds but does have a “Show more” option to see upload speeds, latency, the internet protocol, and where the host server is located.    Results may vary depending on where you’re located, and the test is designed purely for American internet users.   For those worried about bias in Comcast’s results, it’s worth noting that our testing showed the site to produce results in line with or in excess of advertised speeds for Comcast’s direct competitor, Verizon FiOS. Pros:   The results are consistent with other speed tests   It’s dead simple to use, and there are no ads    Test servers are located in the US Cons:   It is a test operated by an ISP    The information it provides appears geared towards reducing support calls

    The FCC’s Speed Test app

    Best speed test app

    The FCC in April launched the FCC Speed Test app. It’s available as an Android app in the Google Play Store and an iOS app in Apple’s App Store. That means you can’t run the test from your desktop, but you are taking part in an important project for the commission to get a clearer picture of broadband quality across America. The test produces results once you press the button to start the test in the mobile app. The data collected is used to help the FCC improve its broadband maps. Under the Trump administration, Microsoft argued the FCC was severely overestimating how many residents had access to fast broadband. Microsoft’s data suggested almost half of America’s population did not have access to speeds of at least 25 Mpbs rather than the 24 million estimated in the FCC’s maps. Data is shared with the FCC’s Measuring Broadband America research program, an important national project that will help determine where funding is allocated in years to come. It’s a case where broadband speed tests aren’t just about your own connection speed but the state of broadband across the nation. “To close the gap between digital haves and have nots, we are working to build a comprehensive, user-friendly dataset on broadband availability,” said FCC Chair Jessica Rosenworcel. “Expanding the base of consumers who use the FCC Speed Test app will enable us to provide improved coverage information to the public and add to the measurement tools we’re developing to show where broadband is truly available throughout the United States.”ProsIt helps a project to improve fast broadband access across the USThere are no ads or direct commercial interestsThe FCC under the Biden Administration seems keen to look at the consumer rather than carrier interests  Cons It requires an app download, there is no web-based versionThere’s no way to test broadband speeds from a desktop or Ethernet-connected PC

    Why do you need to check your internet speed?

    Speed tests are useful to remote workers who might need to figure out whether a poor connection is due to the ISP or something else, such as a problematic home router, a Wi-Fi interference issue, or even the device they’re testing from — be it a laptop, desktop or a smartphone. The tests can also be handy when disputing an ISP’s claimed speeds for a subscription, and just generally making sure you’re receiving the service level you’re paying for. 

    What is the best internet speed test?

    We found the best internet speed test is Ookla Speedtest. This broadband speed test is extremely user friendly and reliable with a total of more than 40 billion consumer-initiated tests conducted.

    Are some internet speed tests more reliable or trustworthy than others?

    Results can vary widely between broadband speed tests and day-to-day due to changing network conditions. ZDNet considers the five five broadband speed tests above to be reliable and trustworthy. But to get a true picture of your broadband speeds, try running multiple tests across multiple devices and at least two or three of the speed tests listed here. Taking an average of all of the results from these tests should produce the most accurate measurement possible for most home users. 

    For internet speed, how fast is fast enough?

    The FCC currently considers 25Mbps to be a fast enough service for more than four users on a network, but many people will find this insufficient. Netflix considers 25Mbps adequate to stream a 4K video to a single device for what it’s worth. However, most home networks have at least a few, if not numerous devices running at any given time. This means that if another user is eating into that 25Mbps speed, your streaming video quality will likely degrade. For more information, tools like BroadbandNow and advice from our sister site CNet can be helpful resources. 

    How did we choose these internet speed tests?

    ZDNet doesn’t vouch for one test over another. As explained, there are multiple broadband speed tests and people should use at least a few of them to get the most holistic picture of their network’s peformance. Some of them are designed to test a connection for a particular online service, such as Netflix or Stadia, while others can help customer dispute speed claims with ISPs, and the FCC’s speed test might help fill broadband gaps in the community. All in all, the tests listed here are some of the most widely available and well-respected options on the Web. This doesn’t mean that there aren’t better solutions for your individual needs, but these five represent an excellent cross-section of choices for the widest possible array of users. 

    Are there other internet speed tests worth considering?

    OpenSignal for cellular networks

    OpenSignal, which Speedtest.net operator Ookla recently acquired, started out with mobile speed tests and regularly produces reports about 4G and 5G speed results around the world. It crowdsources its results and now also returns results for wifi speeds, but its focus is squarely on the mobile experience. 

    ZDNet Recommends More

  • in

    Google want to crack down on pet scams: Here's what to watch out for

    Google is taking legal action against someone who it claims has been using a network of fraudulent websites that claimed to sell basset hound puppies, along with “alluring photos and fake customer testimonials” in order to take advantage of people during the pandemic.

    Google has filed a lawsuit against the man from Cameroon for allegedly operating a “puppy fraud scheme”.According to Google, Nche Noel Ntse who Google believes resides in Cameroon, allegedly ran several websites purporting to sell cute puppies but did not deliver them, according to the court filing obtained by The Verge. Google filed the lawsuit because it was an “effective tool for establishing a legal precedent, disrupting the tools used by scammers, and raising the consequences for bad actors,” said Albert Shin, a manager for Google’s cyberCrime investigation group, and Mike Trinh, a senior counsel.The chief legal complaint is that Ntse breached his contract with Google by violating its terms of service. He used Gmail and Google Voice to communicate with victims and register fraudulent websites with US-based hosting companies, and to request and receive payments, according to Google’s complaint. Google says Ntse’s alleged activities caused Google financial harm by interfering with Google’s relationships with its users, damaging its reputation, and forcing it to spend over $75,000 on investigations. “Defendant’s exploitative and malicious sham pet adoption schemes abuses Google products to prey on vulnerable victims during an unprecedented pandemic,” the complaint reads. Google pointed to data from the Better Business Bureau which said that pet scams now make up 35% of all online shopping scams reported to them, often targeted people at their most vulnerable as the pandemic led to a record spike in people wanting to own pets. Google argues that the complaint, filed in the San Jose Northern District Court of California, is the right venue because the defendant agreed to Google’s terms of service and used the California-based Dynadot hosting service for the puppy fraud website.AARP, a non-profit advocacy service for elderly people, tipped Google off to the puppy scam in September 2021. Victims sent the $700 in electronic gift cards after discussing a puppy purchase through the Gmail account and Google Voice number but got nothing in return.After the scam website was taken down, Google also found the same person using Google Ads to run campaigns promoting that domain and others. Google says it suspended ads linked to that Ads account. It said the sites and others that are still operational “pose an immediate risk of harm to Google and the public”. The company is seeking damages, legal costs and an injunction preventing the the man from using its services. To avoid falling for a puppy scam yourself, Google recommends:See the pet in person (or on a video call) before paying any money. “More often than not, scammers won’t comply with the request,” Google said.Use verified payment methods. Avoid wiring money or paying with gift cards or prepaid debit cards, Google notes.Reverse image search. Search to see if the item or product is a stock image or stolen photo. Search online for the seller. Ask for the company name, number and street address, and see what search results pop up.  More