Singapore has issued a directive for a Facebook page to be tagged a “Declared Online Location” (DOL) under the country’s Protection from Online Falsehoods and Manipulation Act (POFMA), which requires a notice to be carried on the page stating it has “a history of communicating falsehoods”. The move comes after the author of the Facebook page, operated by the States Times Review, refuses to comply with any POFMA directive issued in previous weeks.
Singapore’s Ministry of Communications and Information (MCI) said in a statement Saturday the DOL order would come into effective tomorrow, on February 16. This meant Facebook would have to comply with the directive by then and carry a notice on the States Times Review page stating it had been labelled a DOL.
ZDNet has approached Facebook for comments and to confirm if it will comply with the directive, and will update this article when the company responds.
Singapore must look beyond online falsehood laws as elections loom
Country’s government is missing the point with its use of correction directives, when it should be looking more closely at how the legislation can be used to address bigger security threats as it prepares for its first elections since the emergence of technology, such as deepfake, and increased online interference.
Read More
According to MCI, the DOL declaration would make it an offence for the owner of the Facebook page, Alex Tan, to benefit from operating it. The directive also would prohibit the “provision of financial support to it for the purpose of supporting, helping, or promoting” the communication of the online falsehoods.
The ministry alleged that Tan had repeatedly stated numerous falsehoods, including three that were the subject of POFMA directives issued between November last year and February 2020. None of these were complied with.
In the latest one, which was served on Friday, the POFMA Office ordered corrections to be made on the States Times Review Facebook page regarding a February 13 post about the ongoing coronavirus outbreak in Singapore. It also issued a Targeted Correction Direction to Facebook, which would have to publish a correction notice on the page that included a link to a POFMA page listing the correct statements.
According to MCI, amongst a list of falsehoods the States Times Review was deemed to have made included stating the Singapore government was unable to trace the source of infection for any patients infected with with virus, that the government was the only nation instructing the public not to wear a mask, and that seven countries had banned travel to the city-state.
The ministry said: “The States Times Review Facebook page has spread falsehoods regarding the COVID-19 virus situation in Singapore..[and] is linked to other websites that are also operated by Alex Tan, which derive monetary benefits from these falsehoods at the expense of Singaporeans and our society.”
ZDNet has approached the ministry for comments, including clarification on what it deems to be monetary benefits gained from the online falsehoods, and will update this article when MCI responds.
Meanwhile, the States Times Review has indicated no plans to abide by the POFMA directives. On its Facebook page, it said: “The POFMA order was issued to quell criticisms against [the ruling political party’s] ministers, who are more concerned with their own political reputation than fixing the Wuhan virus crisis. POFMA is only applicable in the Singapore dictatorship, no other country recognises the censorship’s legitimacy.
“As a political exile, the editor of States Times Review will never comply with any of the POFMA order,” it said.
Facebook had complied with previous POFMA correction directives, including a November 2019 order issued against the States Times Review page.
The Singapore legislation was passed in May, following a brief public debate, and kicked in on October 2 with details on how appeals against directives could be made. The bill had passed amidst strong criticism that it gave the government far-reaching powers over online communication and would be used to stifle free speech as well as quell political opponents.
Under the POFMA, offenders could face up to three or five years’ imprisonment, a SG$30,000 or SG$50,000 fine, or both. If bots or inauthentic accounts were used to amplify falsehoods, the potential penalties that could be applied would be doubled. Offending internet intermediaries, meanwhile, could face up to SG$1 million in fines, and also would receive a daily SG$100,000 fine for each day they continued to breach the Act after conviction.
